PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBAW vs. ASHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBAW vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBAW vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.56%26.47%14.35%16.26%-13.35%13.08%7.44%22.96%-10.38%18.79%
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.27%-13.59%-26.45%2.64%42.24%35.03%-27.51%20.14%

Returns By Period


DBAW

1D
2.61%
1M
-5.70%
YTD
3.56%
6M
10.45%
1Y
25.67%
3Y*
17.45%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.42%

ASHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBAW vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBAW has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBAW vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBAW
DBAW Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBAW Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DBAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBAW vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBAWASHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.46

DBAW vs. ASHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBAWASHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

Correlation

The correlation between DBAW and ASHX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DBAW vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison

DBAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
3.69%3.83%1.70%3.45%8.81%2.05%2.08%2.91%2.93%2.41%1.99%5.74%
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.38%1.76%0.84%0.80%1.78%1.07%2.48%19.46%2.91%

Drawdowns

DBAW vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBAWASHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

Volatility

DBAW vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBAWASHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%