DASH vs. ATMP
DASH (DoorDash, Inc.) is a stock, while ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Over the past 5 years, DASH returned -0.47%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for ATMP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DASH vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DASH achieves a -33.51% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 20.60% return.
DASH
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -33.51%
- 6M
- -33.81%
- 1Y
- -31.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
DASH vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | -33.51% | 35.01% | 69.63% | 102.56% | -67.21% | 4.31% | -21.57% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between DASH and ATMP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.15 |
The correlation between DASH and ATMP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DASH vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
DASH
ATMP
DASH vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DASH | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.23 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 2.53 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 5.89 | -6.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DASH vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DASH drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, roughly equal to the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DASH and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DASH | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -80.86% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.97% | -7.30% | -40.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.97% | -16.48% | -31.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.49% | -22.98% | -59.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.55% | -5.61% | -40.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -31.08% | -12.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.70% | 3.13% | +24.57% |
Volatility
DASH vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) at 5.64%. This indicates that DASH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DASH | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.74% | 5.64% | +8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.95% | 10.99% | +20.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 14.18% | +30.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.01% | 22.25% | +31.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.03% | 27.67% | +29.36% |
Dividends
DASH vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
Neither DASH nor ATMP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DASH and ATMP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DASH has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DASH dropped -82.49% vs ATMP's -80.86%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DASH and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer