PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DARP vs. MEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DARP vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 57.26% return.


DARP

1D
-4.47%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
26.21%
6M
25.50%
1Y
68.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEME

1D
-6.25%
1M
-10.39%
YTD
57.26%
6M
44.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DARP vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
26.21%7.02%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
57.26%-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and MEME is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.65

DARP vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DARP
MEME

Technology

49.5%
66.7%

Communication Services

17.2%
5.5%

Energy

8.2%
4.8%

Industrials

7.7%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%

-

Utilities

4.6%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.6%

Healthcare

1.4%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

5.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

DARP
49.5%
MEME
66.7%

Communication Services

DARP
17.2%
MEME
5.5%

Energy

DARP
8.2%
MEME
4.8%

Industrials

DARP
7.7%
MEME
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DARP
5.6%
MEME

-

Utilities

DARP
4.6%
MEME
4.9%

Basic Materials

DARP
3.2%
MEME
4.6%

Healthcare

DARP
1.4%
MEME
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

DARP

-

MEME

-

Financial Services

DARP

-

MEME
5.5%

Real Estate

DARP

-

MEME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DARP vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DARP vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DARPMEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.69

DARP vs. MEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DARP vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and MEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DARPMEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

-48.78%

+18.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-17.37%

+11.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-28.63%

+23.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

Volatility

DARP vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DARPMEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.83%

75.52%

-50.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.48%

75.52%

-49.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.48%

75.52%

-49.04%

DARP vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

DARP vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.34%0.43%1.93%0.32%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DARP and MEME have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.69% for MEME.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DARP and MEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer