DARP vs. FDL
DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Grizzle, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. DARP is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past year, DARP returned 54.61% vs 28.21% for FDL. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DARP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
DARP vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 27.36% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 19.24% return.
DARP
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 15.74%
- YTD
- 27.36%
- 1Y
- 54.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.07%
FDL
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- YTD
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 28.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $444.32K | $313.93K | $438.54K | |
| $50.65M | $49.05M | $43.27M |
DARP vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 27.36% | 40.19% | 24.63% | 6.25% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 19.24% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between DARP and FDL is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023 | 0.07 |
The correlation between DARP and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DARP vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DARP
FDL
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
DARP
FDL
Communication Services
DARP
FDL
Energy
DARP
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
DARP
FDL
Industrials
DARP
FDL
Utilities
DARP
FDL
Basic Materials
DARP
FDL
Healthcare
DARP
FDL
Consumer Defensive
DARP
-
FDL
Financial Services
DARP
-
FDL
Real Estate
DARP
-
FDL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DARP vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
DARP
FDL
DARP vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DARP | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 6.63 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 15.64 | -2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DARP vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DARP | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.27% | -65.93% | +35.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.76% | -4.27% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | -1.07% | -3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -9.59% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 1.81% | +2.36% |
Volatility
DARP vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.55%. This indicates that DARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DARP | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.12% | 4.55% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.55% | 8.76% | +12.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.96% | 11.87% | +15.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.86% | 14.43% | +12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.86% | 17.16% | +9.70% |
DARP vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
DARP vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FDL's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.43% | 1.93% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.56% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DARP and FDL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DARP has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to FDL (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 54.61% vs 28.21% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 54.61% return vs 28.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.34% for DARP.
DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.43% for FDL.
FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DARP and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer