PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DARP vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DARP vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DARP achieves a 27.36% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 19.24% return.


DARP

1D
2.64%
1M
1.10%
6M
15.74%
YTD
27.36%
1Y
54.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.07%

FDL

1D
0.52%
1M
4.21%
6M
8.54%
YTD
19.24%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
11.14%
ALL TIME*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$444.32K$313.93K$438.54K
$50.65M$49.05M$43.27M

DARP vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
27.36%40.19%24.63%6.25%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
19.24%14.79%17.98%7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DARP and FDL is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023

0.07

The correlation between DARP and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DARP vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DARP
FDL

Technology

48.3%
4.3%

Communication Services

13.5%
11.2%

Energy

9.2%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
4.4%

Industrials

8.2%
3.6%

Utilities

5.2%
15.4%

Basic Materials

4.2%
0.4%

Healthcare

1.4%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

24.3%

Financial Services

-

13.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

DARP
48.3%
FDL
4.3%

Communication Services

DARP
13.5%
FDL
11.2%

Energy

DARP
9.2%
FDL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DARP
8.3%
FDL
4.4%

Industrials

DARP
8.2%
FDL
3.6%

Utilities

DARP
5.2%
FDL
15.4%

Basic Materials

DARP
4.2%
FDL
0.4%

Healthcare

DARP
1.4%
FDL
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

DARP

-

FDL
24.3%

Financial Services

DARP

-

FDL
13.7%

Real Estate

DARP

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DARP vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DARP vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DARPFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

6.63

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

15.64

-2.50

DARP vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DARP Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DARP and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DARP vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DARP drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DARP and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DARPFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

-65.93%

+35.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.76%

-4.27%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.73%

-1.07%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-9.59%

+4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

1.81%

+2.36%

Volatility

DARP vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a higher volatility of 10.12% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 4.55%. This indicates that DARP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DARPFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.12%

4.55%

+5.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.55%

8.76%

+12.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.96%

11.87%

+15.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

14.43%

+12.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.86%

17.16%

+9.70%

DARP vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DARP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

DARP vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FDL's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.34%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.56%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DARP and FDL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DARP has higher volatility (10.12%) compared to FDL (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DARP dropped -30.27% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 54.61% vs 28.21% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 54.61% return vs 28.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.34% for DARP.

DARP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Grizzle and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DARP and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DARP and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer