DAC vs. CRDO
DAC (Danaos Corporation) and CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. DAC operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while CRDO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, DAC returned 31.85%/yr vs 142.90%/yr for CRDO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DAC vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAC achieves a 41.54% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 74.31% return.
DAC
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 41.54%
- 6M
- 41.94%
- 1Y
- 52.23%
- 3Y*
- 31.85%
- 5Y*
- 16.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
CRDO
- 1D
- -5.27%
- 1M
- 35.91%
- YTD
- 74.31%
- 6M
- 74.28%
- 1Y
- 241.28%
- 3Y*
- 142.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DAC vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAC Danaos Corporation | 41.54% | 22.24% | 12.41% | 47.51% | -31.97% |
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 74.31% | 114.09% | 245.20% | 46.28% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAC and CRDO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.20 |
The correlation between DAC and CRDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DAC:
$2.39B
CRDO:
$48.33B
DAC:
$28.34
CRDO:
$2.50
DAC:
4.63
CRDO:
100.50
DAC:
2.31
CRDO:
35.55
DAC:
0.61
CRDO:
23.42
DAC:
$1.04B
CRDO:
$1.34B
DAC:
$705.76M
CRDO:
$908.35M
DAC:
$739.01M
CRDO:
$463.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAC vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank
DAC
CRDO
DAC vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAC | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 4.46 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 10.76 | +3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAC vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAC and CRDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAC | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.42% | -62.04% | -37.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.58% | -53.59% | +41.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -61.05% | +32.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.36% | -5.27% | -61.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.43% | -19.38% | -61.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 22.17% | -18.22% |
Volatility
DAC vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Danaos Corporation (DAC) is 6.04%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 28.41%. This indicates that DAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAC | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 28.41% | -22.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 65.16% | -48.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.41% | 85.70% | -64.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.36% | 81.50% | -47.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.00% | 81.50% | -16.50% |
Dividends
DAC vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison
DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, while CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DAC Danaos Corporation | 2.70% | 3.66% | 4.06% | 4.12% | 5.70% | 2.01% |
Financials
DAC vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaos Corporation and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DAC vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison
DAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.
CRDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.
DAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.
CRDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.
DAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.
CRDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DAC and CRDO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDO has higher volatility (28.41%) compared to DAC (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAC dropped -99.42% vs CRDO's -62.04%.
CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAC and CRDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer