CRDO vs. NVDA
CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CRDO in Communication Equipment, NVDA in Semiconductors. Over the past 3 years, CRDO returned 135.36%/yr vs 76.15%/yr for NVDA. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CRDO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRDO achieves a 49.14% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 15.15% return.
CRDO
- 1D
- -6.29%
- 1M
- 19.18%
- YTD
- 49.14%
- 6M
- 13.43%
- 1Y
- 198.39%
- 3Y*
- 135.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- 8.20%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 6M
- 19.59%
- 1Y
- 52.10%
- 3Y*
- 76.15%
- 5Y*
- 65.05%
- 10Y*
- 68.84%
CRDO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 49.14% | 114.09% | 245.20% | 46.28% | 14.25% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 15.15% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -33.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRDO and NVDA is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CRDO and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRDO:
$41.35B
NVDA:
$5.24T
CRDO:
$2.50
NVDA:
$6.53
CRDO:
85.99
NVDA:
32.91
CRDO:
0.07
NVDA:
0.18
CRDO:
30.42
NVDA:
20.72
CRDO:
20.04
NVDA:
26.80
CRDO:
$1.34B
NVDA:
$253.49B
CRDO:
$908.35M
NVDA:
$187.95B
CRDO:
$463.79M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRDO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
CRDO
NVDA
CRDO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRDO | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.35 | 1.53 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 2.15 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 2.59 | +1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 6.36 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRDO | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 1.53 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.63 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
CRDO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRDO drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDO and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRDO | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.04% | -89.72% | +27.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.59% | -20.21% | -33.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.05% | -36.88% | -24.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.08% | -8.90% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -36.21% | +16.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.17% | 8.21% | +13.96% |
Volatility
CRDO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a higher volatility of 28.92% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.53%. This indicates that CRDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRDO | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.92% | 12.53% | +16.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.87% | 25.54% | +39.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.00% | 34.22% | +51.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.41% | 51.69% | +29.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.41% | 49.80% | +31.61% |
Dividends
CRDO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
CRDO vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRDO vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
CRDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
CRDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
CRDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRDO and NVDA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDO has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to NVDA (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDO dropped -62.04% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRDO and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer