PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DAC vs. ESEA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


DACESEA
YTD Return13.63%36.56%
1Y Return28.04%62.44%
3Y Return (Ann)9.36%16.53%
5Y Return (Ann)51.09%60.10%
10Y Return (Ann)0.63%-4.05%
Sharpe Ratio1.101.22
Sortino Ratio1.682.02
Omega Ratio1.201.23
Calmar Ratio0.310.66
Martin Ratio2.966.64
Ulcer Index8.85%9.57%
Daily Std Dev23.85%52.31%
Max Drawdown-99.42%-99.81%
Current Drawdown-80.34%-94.54%

Fundamentals


DACESEA
Market Cap$1.59B$284.89M
EPS$29.29$16.74
PE Ratio2.792.43
PEG Ratio0.52-0.53
Total Revenue (TTM)$736.49M$154.50M
Gross Profit (TTM)$449.69M$92.31M
EBITDA (TTM)$340.85M$102.98M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between DAC and ESEA is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

DAC vs. ESEA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, DAC achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly lower than ESEA's 36.56% return. Over the past 10 years, DAC has outperformed ESEA with an annualized return of 0.63%, while ESEA has yielded a comparatively lower -4.05% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.42%
18.91%
DAC
ESEA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DAC vs. ESEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Euroseas Ltd (ESEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DAC, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.10
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DAC, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DAC, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.20
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DAC, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DAC, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.96
ESEA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ESEA, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ESEA, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ESEA, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ESEA, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ESEA, currently valued at 6.64, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.64

DAC vs. ESEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the ESEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAC and ESEA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.10
1.22
DAC
ESEA

Dividends

DAC vs. ESEA - Dividend Comparison

DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than ESEA's 5.66% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
DAC
Danaos Corporation
3.91%4.12%5.70%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd
5.66%6.42%8.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.46%

Drawdowns

DAC vs. ESEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, roughly equal to the maximum ESEA drawdown of -99.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAC and ESEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-80.34%
-94.54%
DAC
ESEA

Volatility

DAC vs. ESEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Danaos Corporation (DAC) is 7.34%, while Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that DAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.34%
11.26%
DAC
ESEA

Financials

DAC vs. ESEA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaos Corporation and Euroseas Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items