PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAC vs. ESEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DAC vs. ESEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Euroseas Ltd (ESEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAC achieves a 37.32% return, which is significantly higher than ESEA's 29.21% return. Over the past 10 years, DAC has underperformed ESEA with an annualized return of 13.39%, while ESEA has yielded a comparatively higher 24.38% annualized return.


DAC

1D
1.14%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
37.32%
6M
36.90%
1Y
50.89%
3Y*
29.12%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*
13.39%

ESEA

1D
0.45%
1M
6.95%
YTD
29.21%
6M
28.98%
1Y
63.24%
3Y*
79.23%
5Y*
42.03%
10Y*
24.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAC vs. ESEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAC
Danaos Corporation
37.32%22.24%12.41%47.51%-26.57%256.10%133.44%-12.57%-48.28%-45.28%
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd
29.21%140.95%23.60%83.39%-21.02%358.75%33.42%-27.32%-58.82%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DAC and ESEA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2006

0.28

Over the past year, DAC and ESEA have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DAC:

$2.32B

ESEA:

$481.75M

EPS

DAC:

$28.34

ESEA:

$18.99

PE Ratio

DAC:

4.50

ESEA:

3.63

PS Ratio

DAC:

2.24

ESEA:

2.12

PB Ratio

DAC:

0.59

ESEA:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

DAC:

$1.04B

ESEA:

$227.36M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DAC:

$705.76M

ESEA:

$148.47M

EBITDA (TTM)

DAC:

$739.01M

ESEA:

$165.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAC vs. ESEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAC
DAC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ESEA
ESEA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ESEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ESEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESEA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAC vs. ESEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Euroseas Ltd (ESEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DACESEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

3.46

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.93

7.05

+5.88

DAC vs. ESEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the ESEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAC and ESEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DAC vs. ESEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, roughly equal to the maximum ESEA drawdown of -99.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAC and ESEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DACESEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.42%

-99.84%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-18.36%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.87%

-38.00%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.14%

-51.28%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.81%

-95.54%

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.36%

-86.88%

+19.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.42%

-85.40%

+4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

8.99%

-5.04%

Volatility

DAC vs. ESEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Danaos Corporation (DAC) is 5.41%, while Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) has a volatility of 17.67%. This indicates that DAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DACESEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

17.67%

-12.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

33.05%

-16.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.14%

44.73%

-23.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.26%

55.14%

-20.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.03%

94.53%

-29.50%

Dividends

DAC vs. ESEA - Dividend Comparison

DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than ESEA's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DAC
Danaos Corporation
2.79%3.66%4.06%4.12%5.70%2.01%
ESEA
Euroseas Ltd
5.22%16.23%6.63%6.42%8.13%0.00%

Financials

DAC vs. ESEA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaos Corporation and Euroseas Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
253.70M
55.84M
(DAC) Total Revenue
(ESEA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DAC vs. ESEA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Danaos Corporation and Euroseas Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
59.3%
67.6%
Portfolio components
DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

ESEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.73M and revenue of 55.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

ESEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported an operating income of 34.03M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.

ESEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a net income of 32.52M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in a net margin of 58.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DAC and ESEA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESEA has higher volatility (17.67%) compared to DAC (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAC dropped -99.42% vs ESEA's -99.84%.

DAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAC and ESEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer