PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAC vs. NAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DAC vs. NAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAC achieves a 38.84% return, which is significantly lower than NAT's 57.07% return. Over the past 10 years, DAC has outperformed NAT with an annualized return of 12.43%, while NAT has yielded a comparatively lower -2.67% annualized return.


DAC

1D
0.17%
1M
8.28%
YTD
38.84%
6M
35.39%
1Y
55.90%
3Y*
33.31%
5Y*
20.14%
10Y*
12.43%

NAT

1D
-0.57%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
57.07%
6M
52.53%
1Y
118.64%
3Y*
26.17%
5Y*
17.80%
10Y*
-2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAC vs. NAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAC
Danaos Corporation
38.84%22.24%12.41%47.51%-26.57%256.10%133.44%-12.57%-48.28%-45.28%
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
57.07%54.57%-33.63%55.83%87.90%-41.48%-32.82%156.48%-13.56%-68.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DAC and NAT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2006

0.28

Over the past year, DAC and NAT have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DAC:

$2.35B

NAT:

$1.11B

EPS

DAC:

$28.34

NAT:

$0.26

PE Ratio

DAC:

4.54

NAT:

20.43

PS Ratio

DAC:

2.27

NAT:

3.32

PB Ratio

DAC:

0.60

NAT:

2.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

DAC:

$1.04B

NAT:

$334.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DAC:

$705.76M

NAT:

$97.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

DAC:

$739.01M

NAT:

$132.71M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAC vs. NAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAC
DAC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

NAT
NAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAC vs. NAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DACNATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.62

3.30

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.56

3.96

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

6.70

-2.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.34

22.33

-7.99

DAC vs. NAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the NAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAC and NAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DACNATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

3.30

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.35

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

-0.05

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.14

-0.17

Drawdowns

DAC vs. NAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than NAT's maximum drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAC and NAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DACNATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.42%

-90.20%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-18.45%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.87%

-46.31%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.14%

-59.88%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.81%

-87.33%

-8.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.00%

-44.58%

-22.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.47%

-44.00%

-36.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

5.53%

-1.62%

Volatility

DAC vs. NAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Danaos Corporation (DAC) is 7.72%, while Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that DAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DACNATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

9.26%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.63%

27.63%

-11.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.44%

36.21%

-14.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.69%

51.06%

-16.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.07%

58.03%

+7.04%

Dividends

DAC vs. NAT - Dividend Comparison

DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than NAT's 8.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAC
Danaos Corporation
2.76%3.66%4.06%4.12%5.70%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
8.97%10.47%16.00%11.67%3.59%3.55%15.25%2.03%8.00%21.54%16.31%8.88%

Financials

DAC vs. NAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaos Corporation and Nordic American Tankers Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
253.70M
106.46M
(DAC) Total Revenue
(NAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DAC vs. NAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Danaos Corporation and Nordic American Tankers Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
59.3%
44.8%
Portfolio components
DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.

NAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported a gross profit of 47.64M and revenue of 106.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.8%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

NAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported an operating income of 38.36M and revenue of 106.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.

NAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 106.46M, resulting in a net margin of 43.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DAC and NAT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAT has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to DAC (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAC dropped -99.42% vs NAT's -90.20%.

NAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAC and NAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer