PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDO vs. ZETA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRDO vs. ZETA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDO achieves a 49.14% return, which is significantly higher than ZETA's 14.35% return.


CRDO

1D
-6.29%
1M
19.18%
YTD
49.14%
6M
13.43%
1Y
198.39%
3Y*
135.36%
5Y*
10Y*

ZETA

1D
-7.84%
1M
26.06%
YTD
14.35%
6M
26.47%
1Y
76.69%
3Y*
37.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRDO vs. ZETA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
49.14%114.09%245.20%46.28%14.25%
ZETA
Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
14.35%13.12%103.97%7.96%5.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CRDO and ZETA is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.34

The correlation between CRDO and ZETA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

CRDO:

$2.50

ZETA:

-$0.14

PS Ratio

CRDO:

30.42

ZETA:

2.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRDO:

$1.34B

ZETA:

$1.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRDO:

$908.35M

ZETA:

$881.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRDO:

$463.79M

ZETA:

$50.09M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRDO vs. ZETA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

ZETA
ZETA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ZETA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZETA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZETA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ZETA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZETA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDO vs. ZETA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRDOZETADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

1.05

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

1.99

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

1.91

+1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.99

3.91

+5.08

CRDO vs. ZETA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDO Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the ZETA Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDO and ZETA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRDOZETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.05

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.30

+0.88

Drawdowns

CRDO vs. ZETA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDO drawdown since its inception was -62.04%, smaller than the maximum ZETA drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDO and ZETA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDOZETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.04%

-70.01%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.59%

-40.37%

-13.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.05%

-70.01%

+8.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.08%

-36.66%

+27.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.49%

-34.03%

+14.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.17%

19.66%

+2.51%

Volatility

CRDO vs. ZETA - Volatility Comparison

Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a higher volatility of 28.92% compared to Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) at 24.19%. This indicates that CRDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZETA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRDOZETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.92%

24.19%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.87%

48.30%

+16.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.00%

73.49%

+12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.41%

72.21%

+9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.41%

72.21%

+9.20%

Dividends

CRDO vs. ZETA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRDO nor ZETA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRDO vs. ZETA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Zeta Global Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
437.00M
396.30M
(CRDO) Total Revenue
(ZETA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRDO vs. ZETA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
68.2%
59.0%
Portfolio components
CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

ZETA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 233.86M and revenue of 396.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

ZETA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of -18.84M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.8%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.

ZETA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. reported a net income of -13.25M and revenue of 396.30M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRDO and ZETA have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to ZETA (24.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRDO dropped -62.04% vs ZETA's -70.01%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRDO and ZETA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer