DAC vs. ZIM
DAC (Danaos Corporation) and ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, DAC returned 16.05%/yr vs 18.83%/yr for ZIM. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
DAC vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAC achieves a 37.32% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 23.05% return.
DAC
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 37.32%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 50.89%
- 3Y*
- 29.12%
- 5Y*
- 16.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
ZIM
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 23.05%
- 6M
- 31.40%
- 1Y
- 61.18%
- 3Y*
- 52.37%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- —
DAC vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAC Danaos Corporation | 37.32% | 22.24% | 12.41% | 47.51% | -26.57% | 205.61% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 23.05% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAC and ZIM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between DAC and ZIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DAC:
$2.32B
ZIM:
$3.04B
DAC:
$28.34
ZIM:
$0.81
DAC:
4.50
ZIM:
31.10
DAC:
2.24
ZIM:
0.48
DAC:
0.59
ZIM:
0.80
DAC:
$1.04B
ZIM:
$6.29B
DAC:
$705.76M
ZIM:
$676.00M
DAC:
$739.01M
ZIM:
$1.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAC vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank
DAC
ZIM
DAC vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaos Corporation (DAC) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAC | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.26 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 2.06 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | 5.18 | +7.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAC vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAC and ZIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAC | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.42% | -84.68% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.58% | -29.84% | +17.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -57.12% | +28.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.14% | -84.68% | +34.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.36% | -11.49% | -55.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.42% | -39.77% | -40.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 11.85% | -7.90% |
Volatility
DAC vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Danaos Corporation (DAC) is 5.41%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that DAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAC | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 11.94% | -6.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.71% | 36.70% | -19.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.14% | 52.54% | -31.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.26% | 65.74% | -31.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.03% | 67.49% | -2.46% |
Dividends
DAC vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than ZIM's 4.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAC Danaos Corporation | 2.79% | 3.66% | 4.06% | 4.12% | 5.70% | 2.01% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 4.95% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% |
Financials
DAC vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaos Corporation and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DAC vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison
DAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 150.55M and revenue of 253.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.3%.
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.
DAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 125.20M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
DAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 140.42M and revenue of 253.70M, resulting in a net margin of 55.4%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DAC and ZIM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to DAC (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAC dropped -99.42% vs ZIM's -84.68%.
DAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAC and ZIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer