PortfoliosLab logo
DAC vs. ZIM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between DAC and ZIM is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

DAC vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Danaos Corporation (DAC) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DAC:

0.18

ZIM:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

DAC:

0.52

ZIM:

1.32

Omega Ratio

DAC:

1.06

ZIM:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

DAC:

0.08

ZIM:

0.82

Martin Ratio

DAC:

0.47

ZIM:

2.67

Ulcer Index

DAC:

13.53%

ZIM:

18.36%

Daily Std Dev

DAC:

29.98%

ZIM:

78.30%

Max Drawdown

DAC:

-99.42%

ZIM:

-84.68%

Current Drawdown

DAC:

-78.76%

ZIM:

-34.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DAC:

$1.60B

ZIM:

$2.20B

EPS

DAC:

$26.07

ZIM:

$17.58

PE Ratio

DAC:

3.28

ZIM:

1.03

PS Ratio

DAC:

1.58

ZIM:

0.26

PB Ratio

DAC:

0.47

ZIM:

0.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

DAC:

$759.63M

ZIM:

$6.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DAC:

$487.18M

ZIM:

$2.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

DAC:

$494.84M

ZIM:

$3.33B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAC achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than ZIM's 3.85% return.


DAC

YTD

9.21%

1M

13.86%

6M

2.99%

1Y

5.41%

5Y*

93.10%

10Y*

1.30%

ZIM

YTD

3.85%

1M

35.98%

6M

2.38%

1Y

49.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DAC vs. ZIM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DAC is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DAC is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DAC is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DAC is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DAC is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DAC is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZIM is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZIM is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DAC vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaos Corporation (DAC) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAC and ZIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

DAC vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than ZIM's 43.54% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
DAC
Danaos Corporation
3.81%4.06%4.12%5.70%2.01%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
43.54%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%

Drawdowns

DAC vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAC and ZIM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DAC vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Danaos Corporation (DAC) is 9.06%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 22.13%. This indicates that DAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

DAC vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaos Corporation and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
258.18M
2.17B
(DAC) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DAC vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Danaos Corporation and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
61.2%
33.7%
(DAC) Gross Margin
(ZIM) Gross Margin
DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 158.07M and revenue of 258.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 731.00M and revenue of 2.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 128.79M and revenue of 258.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.9%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 657.60M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 90.43M and revenue of 258.18M, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 561.50M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.