PortfoliosLab logo
DAC vs. MATX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between DAC and MATX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

DAC vs. MATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DAC:

0.37

MATX:

0.06

Sortino Ratio

DAC:

0.75

MATX:

0.46

Omega Ratio

DAC:

1.09

MATX:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

DAC:

0.13

MATX:

0.09

Martin Ratio

DAC:

0.83

MATX:

0.25

Ulcer Index

DAC:

13.50%

MATX:

16.38%

Daily Std Dev

DAC:

29.77%

MATX:

44.10%

Max Drawdown

DAC:

-99.42%

MATX:

-70.57%

Current Drawdown

DAC:

-78.22%

MATX:

-29.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DAC:

$1.63B

MATX:

$3.72B

EPS

DAC:

$26.05

MATX:

$15.07

PE Ratio

DAC:

3.35

MATX:

7.56

PEG Ratio

DAC:

0.52

MATX:

3.31

PS Ratio

DAC:

1.60

MATX:

1.07

PB Ratio

DAC:

0.44

MATX:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

DAC:

$759.63M

MATX:

$3.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DAC:

$487.18M

MATX:

$1.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

DAC:

$494.84M

MATX:

$871.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAC achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly higher than MATX's -12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, DAC has underperformed MATX with an annualized return of 1.87%, while MATX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.


DAC

YTD

12.03%

1M

20.90%

6M

9.56%

1Y

10.80%

5Y*

94.91%

10Y*

1.87%

MATX

YTD

-12.24%

1M

15.27%

6M

-27.83%

1Y

2.49%

5Y*

38.44%

10Y*

12.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DAC vs. MATX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DAC is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DAC is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DAC is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DAC is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DAC is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DAC is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MATX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MATX is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MATX is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MATX is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MATX is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MATX is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MATX is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DAC vs. MATX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the MATX Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAC and MATX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

DAC vs. MATX - Dividend Comparison

DAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than MATX's 1.16% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DAC
Danaos Corporation
3.72%4.06%4.12%5.70%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MATX
Matson, Inc.
1.16%0.98%1.15%1.95%1.18%1.58%2.11%2.56%2.61%2.09%1.64%1.91%

Drawdowns

DAC vs. MATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAC drawdown since its inception was -99.42%, which is greater than MATX's maximum drawdown of -70.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAC and MATX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DAC vs. MATX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Danaos Corporation (DAC) is 9.46%, while Matson, Inc. (MATX) has a volatility of 27.21%. This indicates that DAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

DAC vs. MATX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaos Corporation and Matson, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
258.18M
782.00M
(DAC) Total Revenue
(MATX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DAC vs. MATX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Danaos Corporation and Matson, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
61.2%
100.0%
(DAC) Gross Margin
(MATX) Gross Margin
DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 158.07M and revenue of 258.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

MATX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matson, Inc. reported a gross profit of 782.00M and revenue of 782.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 128.79M and revenue of 258.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.9%.

MATX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matson, Inc. reported an operating income of 82.10M and revenue of 782.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 90.43M and revenue of 258.18M, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.

MATX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matson, Inc. reported a net income of 72.30M and revenue of 782.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.