PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYBR.TO vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYBR.TO vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CYBR.TO is traded in CAD, while CIBR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBR.TO achieves a 35.74% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's 30.16% return.


CYBR.TO

1D
-3.36%
1M
30.12%
YTD
35.74%
6M
27.94%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
25.26%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

CIBR

1D
-2.41%
1M
34.05%
YTD
30.16%
6M
23.55%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
29.81%
5Y*
19.60%
10Y*
19.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYBR.TO vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CYBR.TO
Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units
35.74%2.14%13.45%44.51%-37.17%5.69%66.99%24.97%5.96%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
30.16%7.88%28.37%36.63%-21.21%18.59%47.98%22.20%7.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBR.TO and CIBR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2018

0.79

The correlation between CYBR.TO and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

CYBR.TO vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CYBR.TO
CIBR

Technology

88.2%
94.0%

Communication Services

7.0%
2.6%

Industrials

4.0%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CYBR.TO
88.2%
CIBR
94.0%

Communication Services

CYBR.TO
7.0%
CIBR
2.6%

Industrials

CYBR.TO
4.0%
CIBR
3.5%

Real Estate

CYBR.TO
0.8%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

CYBR.TO

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Cyclical

CYBR.TO

-

CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

CYBR.TO

-

CIBR

-

Energy

CYBR.TO

-

CIBR

-

Financial Services

CYBR.TO

-

CIBR

-

Healthcare

CYBR.TO

-

CIBR

-

Utilities

CYBR.TO

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYBR.TO vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYBR.TO
CYBR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBR.TO vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CYBR.TOCIBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.13

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

1.65

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.20

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.84

2.72

-0.88

CYBR.TO vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBR.TO and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CYBR.TOCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.13

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.84

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.75

-0.17

Drawdowns

CYBR.TO vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBR.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBR.TO and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYBR.TOCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.40%

-29.21%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.10%

-23.01%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.10%

-23.01%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

-29.21%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-2.41%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-7.86%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.19%

10.11%

+3.08%

Volatility

CYBR.TO vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.24% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 10.63%. This indicates that CYBR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYBR.TOCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.24%

10.63%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.55%

20.89%

+3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.30%

24.34%

+3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.60%

23.42%

+4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.69%

22.23%

+4.46%

Dividends

CYBR.TO vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

CYBR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than CIBR's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.45%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
CYBR.TO
Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units
0.17%0.23%0.24%0.27%0.39%0.26%0.38%0.64%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYBR.TO and CIBR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYBR.TO and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer