PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CYBR.TO vs. WCBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CYBR.TO vs. WCBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CYBR.TO is traded in CAD, while WCBR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WCBR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CYBR.TO achieves a 35.74% return, which is significantly higher than WCBR's 28.44% return.


CYBR.TO

1D
-3.36%
1M
30.12%
YTD
35.74%
6M
27.94%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
25.26%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*

WCBR

1D
-3.47%
1M
32.64%
YTD
28.44%
6M
19.45%
1Y
14.28%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CYBR.TO vs. WCBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CYBR.TO
Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units
35.74%2.14%13.45%44.51%-37.17%1.12%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
28.44%-5.96%20.99%62.96%-37.82%5.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CYBR.TO and WCBR is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.80

The correlation between CYBR.TO and WCBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

CYBR.TO vs. WCBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CYBR.TO
WCBR

Technology

88.2%
100.0%

Communication Services

7.0%

-

Industrials

4.0%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CYBR.TO
88.2%
WCBR
100.0%

Communication Services

CYBR.TO
7.0%
WCBR

-

Industrials

CYBR.TO
4.0%
WCBR

-

Real Estate

CYBR.TO
0.8%
WCBR

-

Basic Materials

CYBR.TO

-

WCBR

-

Consumer Cyclical

CYBR.TO

-

WCBR

-

Consumer Defensive

CYBR.TO

-

WCBR

-

Energy

CYBR.TO

-

WCBR

-

Financial Services

CYBR.TO

-

WCBR

-

Healthcare

CYBR.TO

-

WCBR

-

Utilities

CYBR.TO

-

WCBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CYBR.TO vs. WCBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CYBR.TO
CYBR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

WCBR
WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CYBR.TO vs. WCBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) and WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CYBR.TOWCBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.10

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

0.47

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

1.02

+0.82

CYBR.TO vs. WCBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the WCBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CYBR.TO and WCBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CYBR.TOWCBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.45

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.40

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.27

+0.31

Drawdowns

CYBR.TO vs. WCBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CYBR.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.40%, smaller than the maximum WCBR drawdown of -48.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CYBR.TO and WCBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CYBR.TOWCBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.40%

-48.18%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.10%

-30.80%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.10%

-32.46%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.40%

-48.18%

+3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-3.87%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-18.66%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.19%

14.03%

-0.84%

Volatility

CYBR.TO vs. WCBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) is 12.24%, while WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that CYBR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CYBR.TOWCBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.24%

13.27%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.55%

27.45%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.30%

32.15%

-3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.60%

32.32%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.69%

32.29%

-5.60%

Dividends

CYBR.TO vs. WCBR - Dividend Comparison

CYBR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CYBR.TO
Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units
0.17%0.23%0.24%0.27%0.39%0.26%0.38%0.64%0.79%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.03%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CYBR.TO and WCBR have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CYBR.TO and WCBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer