CWT vs. JNJ
CWT (California Water Service Group) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. CWT operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CWT returned 6.29%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for JNJ. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CWT vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWT achieves a 17.43% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 25.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CWT has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 6.29%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.44% annualized return.
CWT
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- 1.23%
- 5Y*
- -2.29%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.58%
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- YTD
- 25.25%
- 1Y
- 59.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.21M | $23.35M | $24.82M | |
| $2.09B | $2.09B | $1.99B |
CWT vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWT California Water Service Group | 17.43% | -1.81% | -10.64% | -12.83% | -14.13% | 35.05% | 6.68% | 9.85% | 7.06% | 36.39% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 25.25% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWT and JNJ is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.22 |
The correlation between CWT and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CWT:
$3.00B
JNJ:
$617.78B
CWT:
$2.23
JNJ:
$8.63
CWT:
22.50
JNJ:
29.71
CWT:
0.54
JNJ:
0.99
CWT:
2.84
JNJ:
6.38
CWT:
1.66
JNJ:
7.36
CWT:
$1.05B
JNJ:
$97.93B
CWT:
$196.22M
JNJ:
$68.99B
CWT:
$346.36M
JNJ:
$31.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWT vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
CWT
JNJ
CWT vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Water Service Group (CWT) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWT | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.56 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 5.46 | -4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.74 | 15.18 | -13.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWT vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWT drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum JNJ drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWT and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWT | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.21% | -50.67% | +12.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.59% | -10.96% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.13% | -15.72% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.21% | -18.41% | -19.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.21% | -27.37% | -10.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.88% | -4.07% | -18.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -11.88% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.70% | 3.93% | +3.77% |
Volatility
CWT vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for California Water Service Group (CWT) is 6.85%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 8.48%. This indicates that CWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWT | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 8.48% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.17% | 15.03% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.72% | 18.44% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 17.46% | +6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.72% | 18.75% | +8.97% |
Dividends
CWT vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
CWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than JNJ's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWT California Water Service Group | 2.53% | 2.86% | 2.47% | 2.01% | 1.65% | 1.28% | 1.57% | 1.53% | 1.57% | 1.59% | 2.04% | 2.88% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.04% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Financials
CWT vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Water Service Group and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CWT vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
CWT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, California Water Service Group reported a gross profit of -63.68M and revenue of 308.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -20.6%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 18.50B and revenue of 25.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.
CWT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, California Water Service Group reported an operating income of 70.83M and revenue of 308.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 7.17B and revenue of 25.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.3%.
CWT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, California Water Service Group reported a net income of 56.47M and revenue of 308.60M, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.53B and revenue of 25.31B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CWT and JNJ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JNJ has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to CWT (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWT dropped -38.21% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWT and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer