PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWT vs. YORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CWT vs. YORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in California Water Service Group (CWT) and The York Water Company (YORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWT achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly higher than YORW's -6.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CWT has outperformed YORW with an annualized return of 5.12%, while YORW has yielded a comparatively lower 1.63% annualized return.


CWT

1D
0.00%
1M
2.84%
YTD
5.92%
6M
6.05%
1Y
0.09%
3Y*
-1.05%
5Y*
-2.01%
10Y*
5.12%

YORW

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
-6.70%
6M
-8.93%
1Y
-4.34%
3Y*
-8.81%
5Y*
-6.67%
10Y*
1.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWT vs. YORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWT
California Water Service Group
5.92%-1.81%-10.64%-12.83%-14.13%35.05%6.68%9.85%7.06%36.39%
YORW
The York Water Company
-6.70%0.08%-13.23%-12.40%-7.93%8.61%2.67%46.40%-3.34%-9.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CWT and YORW is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1999

0.37

Over the past year, CWT and YORW have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

CWT:

$1.99

YORW:

$1.97

PE Ratio

CWT:

22.68

YORW:

15.01

PEG Ratio

CWT:

0.55

YORW:

6.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

CWT:

$1.01B

YORW:

-$18.46M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CWT:

$366.63M

YORW:

-$40.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

CWT:

$329.51M

YORW:

$31.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWT vs. YORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWT
CWT Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

YORW
YORW Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
YORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
YORW Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
YORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
YORW Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWT vs. YORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Water Service Group (CWT) and The York Water Company (YORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWTYORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.98

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

-0.31

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.01

-0.64

+0.66

CWT vs. YORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWT Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is higher than the YORW Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWT and YORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWT vs. YORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWT drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum YORW drawdown of -46.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWT and YORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWTYORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-46.68%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-13.93%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.13%

-27.44%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.21%

-39.62%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-39.62%

+1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.44%

-38.58%

+8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.71%

-13.09%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.80%

6.76%

+1.04%

Volatility

CWT vs. YORW - Volatility Comparison

California Water Service Group (CWT) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to The York Water Company (YORW) at 5.39%. This indicates that CWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWTYORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

5.39%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.64%

13.96%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.24%

20.58%

+3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

22.81%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.74%

29.25%

-1.51%

Dividends

CWT vs. YORW - Dividend Comparison

CWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than YORW's 3.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.81%2.86%2.47%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%
YORW
The York Water Company
3.03%2.78%2.60%2.12%1.75%1.52%1.56%1.52%2.10%1.91%1.64%2.42%

Financials

CWT vs. YORW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Water Service Group and The York Water Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
214.57M
0
(CWT) Total Revenue
(YORW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CWT and YORW have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWT has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to YORW (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWT dropped -38.21% vs YORW's -46.68%.

CWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWT and YORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer