PortfoliosLab logo
JNJ vs. ABT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between JNJ and ABT is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

JNJ vs. ABT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JNJ:

0.34

ABT:

1.46

Sortino Ratio

JNJ:

0.62

ABT:

2.01

Omega Ratio

JNJ:

1.09

ABT:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

JNJ:

0.41

ABT:

1.10

Martin Ratio

JNJ:

1.10

ABT:

6.72

Ulcer Index

JNJ:

6.37%

ABT:

4.17%

Daily Std Dev

JNJ:

18.66%

ABT:

20.56%

Max Drawdown

JNJ:

-52.60%

ABT:

-45.66%

Current Drawdown

JNJ:

-9.41%

ABT:

-4.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JNJ:

$371.06B

ABT:

$231.82B

EPS

JNJ:

$8.99

ABT:

$7.70

PE Ratio

JNJ:

17.15

ABT:

17.30

PEG Ratio

JNJ:

1.05

ABT:

4.17

PS Ratio

JNJ:

4.15

ABT:

5.47

PB Ratio

JNJ:

4.75

ABT:

4.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

JNJ:

$89.33B

ABT:

$42.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JNJ:

$61.01B

ABT:

$23.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

JNJ:

$34.70B

ABT:

$11.20B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than ABT's 18.96% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has underperformed ABT with an annualized return of 7.19%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


JNJ

YTD

7.49%

1M

1.64%

6M

0.79%

1Y

6.18%

5Y*

3.83%

10Y*

7.19%

ABT

YTD

18.96%

1M

5.50%

6M

15.41%

1Y

29.77%

5Y*

9.23%

10Y*

12.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

JNJ vs. ABT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JNJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JNJ is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JNJ is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JNJ is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JNJ is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JNJ is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JNJ is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ABT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABT is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABT is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABT is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABT is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABT is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABT is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JNJ vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current JNJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the ABT Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNJ and ABT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

JNJ vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison

JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than ABT's 1.71% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
3.22%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%2.64%
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
1.71%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%1.95%

Drawdowns

JNJ vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -52.60%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and ABT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

JNJ vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT) have volatilities of 5.26% and 5.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

JNJ vs. ABT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Johnson & Johnson and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
21.89B
10.36B
(JNJ) Total Revenue
(ABT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

JNJ vs. ABT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Johnson & Johnson and Abbott Laboratories over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
66.4%
56.9%
(JNJ) Gross Margin
(ABT) Gross Margin
JNJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 14.54B and revenue of 21.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

ABT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Abbott Laboratories reported a gross profit of 5.89B and revenue of 10.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

JNJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.30B and revenue of 21.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

ABT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Abbott Laboratories reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

JNJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 11.00B and revenue of 21.89B, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.

ABT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Abbott Laboratories reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 10.36B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.