PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CWT vs. AWR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CWTAWR
YTD Return1.64%9.22%
1Y Return7.57%13.97%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.51%-0.54%
5Y Return (Ann)2.30%2.22%
10Y Return (Ann)9.79%11.77%
Sharpe Ratio0.330.62
Sortino Ratio0.641.04
Omega Ratio1.071.12
Calmar Ratio0.210.40
Martin Ratio0.861.37
Ulcer Index8.76%9.61%
Daily Std Dev23.16%21.20%
Max Drawdown-36.49%-37.39%
Current Drawdown-23.93%-11.91%

Fundamentals


CWTAWR
Market Cap$3.08B$3.26B
EPS$3.46$2.96
PE Ratio14.9929.18
PEG Ratio2.706.85
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.03B$577.54M
Gross Profit (TTM)$433.58M$409.75M
EBITDA (TTM)$394.23M$206.37M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CWT and AWR is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CWT vs. AWR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CWT achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than AWR's 9.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CWT has underperformed AWR with an annualized return of 9.79%, while AWR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.92%
12.03%
CWT
AWR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CWT vs. AWR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Water Service Group (CWT) and American States Water Company (AWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CWT, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.86
AWR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AWR, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AWR, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AWR, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AWR, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AWR, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.45

CWT vs. AWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWT Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the AWR Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWT and AWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.33
0.66
CWT
AWR

Dividends

CWT vs. AWR - Dividend Comparison

CWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than AWR's 2.03% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.12%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%2.64%2.77%
AWR
American States Water Company
2.03%2.06%1.65%1.35%1.61%1.34%1.58%1.72%2.01%2.08%2.21%2.65%

Drawdowns

CWT vs. AWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWT drawdown since its inception was -36.49%, roughly equal to the maximum AWR drawdown of -37.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWT and AWR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-23.93%
-11.91%
CWT
AWR

Volatility

CWT vs. AWR - Volatility Comparison

California Water Service Group (CWT) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to American States Water Company (AWR) at 5.71%. This indicates that CWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.67%
5.71%
CWT
AWR

Financials

CWT vs. AWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Water Service Group and American States Water Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items