PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWT vs. AWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CWT vs. AWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in California Water Service Group (CWT) and American States Water Company (AWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CWT vs. AWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWT
California Water Service Group
5.43%-1.81%-10.64%-12.83%-14.13%35.05%6.68%9.85%7.06%36.39%
AWR
American States Water Company
5.06%-4.32%-1.18%-11.43%-8.92%32.25%-6.75%31.19%17.91%29.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CWT:

$2.71B

AWR:

$2.92B

EPS

CWT:

$2.15

AWR:

$3.37

PE Ratio

CWT:

21.09

AWR:

22.42

PEG Ratio

CWT:

0.51

AWR:

2.11

PS Ratio

CWT:

2.70

AWR:

4.44

PB Ratio

CWT:

1.60

AWR:

2.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

CWT:

$1.00B

AWR:

$658.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CWT:

$436.14M

AWR:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

CWT:

$329.61M

AWR:

$170.81M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWT achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly higher than AWR's 5.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CWT has underperformed AWR with an annualized return of 7.48%, while AWR has yielded a comparatively higher 8.71% annualized return.


CWT

1D
-1.54%
1M
0.58%
YTD
5.43%
6M
0.20%
1Y
-3.91%
3Y*
-5.76%
5Y*
-2.19%
10Y*
7.48%

AWR

1D
-1.43%
1M
1.46%
YTD
5.06%
6M
4.56%
1Y
-1.33%
3Y*
-3.02%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*
8.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWT vs. AWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWT
CWT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWT Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AWR
AWR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWR Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWT vs. AWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Water Service Group (CWT) and American States Water Company (AWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWTAWRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.17

-0.07

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

0.05

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.01

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

-0.01

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.37

-0.01

-0.35

CWT vs. AWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWT Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the AWR Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWT and AWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWTAWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

-0.07

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.09

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.33

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.39

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between CWT and AWR is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CWT vs. AWR - Dividend Comparison

CWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than AWR's 2.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.72%2.86%2.47%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%
AWR
American States Water Company
2.62%2.68%2.30%2.06%1.65%1.35%1.61%1.34%1.58%1.72%2.01%2.08%

Drawdowns

CWT vs. AWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWT drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, roughly equal to the maximum AWR drawdown of -37.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWT and AWR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CWTAWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-37.39%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-12.36%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.21%

-32.85%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-32.85%

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.76%

-19.87%

-10.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-10.77%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.56%

7.03%

+2.53%

Volatility

CWT vs. AWR - Volatility Comparison

California Water Service Group (CWT) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to American States Water Company (AWR) at 6.99%. This indicates that CWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CWTAWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

6.99%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.84%

14.29%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

19.97%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

22.39%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.56%

26.28%

+1.28%

Financials

CWT vs. AWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Water Service Group and American States Water Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
219.98M
164.28M
(CWT) Total Revenue
(AWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items