PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CWT vs. SO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CWTSO
YTD Return1.64%29.54%
1Y Return7.57%34.72%
3Y Return (Ann)-4.51%16.76%
5Y Return (Ann)2.30%11.80%
10Y Return (Ann)9.79%11.27%
Sharpe Ratio0.332.02
Sortino Ratio0.642.95
Omega Ratio1.071.35
Calmar Ratio0.212.79
Martin Ratio0.8610.08
Ulcer Index8.76%3.46%
Daily Std Dev23.16%17.32%
Max Drawdown-36.49%-38.43%
Current Drawdown-23.93%-6.18%

Fundamentals


CWTSO
Market Cap$3.08B$96.78B
EPS$3.46$4.29
PE Ratio14.9920.59
PEG Ratio2.702.92
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.03B$26.43B
Gross Profit (TTM)$433.58M$12.64B
EBITDA (TTM)$394.23M$11.25B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CWT and SO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CWT vs. SO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CWT achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than SO's 29.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CWT has underperformed SO with an annualized return of 9.79%, while SO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.92%
14.21%
CWT
SO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CWT vs. SO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Water Service Group (CWT) and The Southern Company (SO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CWT, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CWT, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.86
SO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SO, currently valued at 2.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.01
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SO, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SO, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SO, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SO, currently valued at 9.99, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.99

CWT vs. SO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWT Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the SO Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWT and SO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.33
2.01
CWT
SO

Dividends

CWT vs. SO - Dividend Comparison

CWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than SO's 3.22% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.12%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%2.64%2.77%
SO
The Southern Company
3.22%3.96%3.78%3.82%4.13%3.86%5.42%4.78%4.52%4.60%4.24%4.89%

Drawdowns

CWT vs. SO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWT drawdown since its inception was -36.49%, smaller than the maximum SO drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWT and SO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-23.93%
-6.18%
CWT
SO

Volatility

CWT vs. SO - Volatility Comparison

California Water Service Group (CWT) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to The Southern Company (SO) at 5.88%. This indicates that CWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.67%
5.88%
CWT
SO

Financials

CWT vs. SO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Water Service Group and The Southern Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items