PortfoliosLab logo
CWT vs. SO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CWT and SO is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CWT vs. SO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in California Water Service Group (CWT) and The Southern Company (SO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CWT:

-0.32

SO:

0.86

Sortino Ratio

CWT:

-0.25

SO:

1.40

Omega Ratio

CWT:

0.97

SO:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

CWT:

-0.17

SO:

1.33

Martin Ratio

CWT:

-0.59

SO:

3.18

Ulcer Index

CWT:

11.23%

SO:

5.57%

Daily Std Dev

CWT:

23.50%

SO:

19.06%

Max Drawdown

CWT:

-38.24%

SO:

-38.43%

Current Drawdown

CWT:

-28.06%

SO:

-2.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CWT:

$2.84B

SO:

$97.60B

EPS

CWT:

$2.26

SO:

$4.17

PE Ratio

CWT:

21.11

SO:

21.27

PEG Ratio

CWT:

2.70

SO:

3.79

PS Ratio

CWT:

2.93

SO:

3.50

PB Ratio

CWT:

1.74

SO:

2.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

CWT:

$970.03M

SO:

$27.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CWT:

$532.30M

SO:

$12.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

CWT:

$351.41M

SO:

$13.58B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWT achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than SO's 10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CWT has underperformed SO with an annualized return of 9.33%, while SO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


CWT

YTD

7.62%

1M

-4.80%

6M

-4.14%

1Y

-7.47%

3Y*

-1.66%

5Y*

3.67%

10Y*

9.33%

SO

YTD

10.54%

1M

-1.72%

6M

3.36%

1Y

16.31%

3Y*

10.90%

5Y*

14.67%

10Y*

12.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


California Water Service Group

The Southern Company

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CWT vs. SO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CWT is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CWT is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CWT is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CWT is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CWT is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CWT is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SO is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SO is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SO is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SO is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SO is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SO is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CWT vs. SO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Water Service Group (CWT) and The Southern Company (SO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CWT Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the SO Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWT and SO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CWT vs. SO - Dividend Comparison

CWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than SO's 3.24% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.41%2.43%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%2.64%
SO
The Southern Company
3.24%3.47%3.96%3.78%3.82%4.13%3.86%5.42%4.78%4.52%4.60%4.24%

Drawdowns

CWT vs. SO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWT drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, roughly equal to the maximum SO drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWT and SO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CWT vs. SO - Volatility Comparison

California Water Service Group (CWT) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to The Southern Company (SO) at 6.66%. This indicates that CWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CWT vs. SO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Water Service Group and The Southern Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20212022202320242025
203.97M
7.78B
(CWT) Total Revenue
(SO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CWT vs. SO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between California Water Service Group and The Southern Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
67.0%
48.1%
(CWT) Gross Margin
(SO) Gross Margin
CWT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported a gross profit of 136.58M and revenue of 203.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.

SO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Southern Company reported a gross profit of 3.74B and revenue of 7.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.1%.

CWT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported an operating income of 22.35M and revenue of 203.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

SO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Southern Company reported an operating income of 2.01B and revenue of 7.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.9%.

CWT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported a net income of 13.33M and revenue of 203.97M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

SO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Southern Company reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 7.78B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.