PortfoliosLab logo
CWT vs. GWRS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CWT and GWRS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CWT vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in California Water Service Group (CWT) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CWT:

-0.30

GWRS:

-0.64

Sortino Ratio

CWT:

-0.33

GWRS:

-0.86

Omega Ratio

CWT:

0.96

GWRS:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

CWT:

-0.20

GWRS:

-0.40

Martin Ratio

CWT:

-0.69

GWRS:

-1.51

Ulcer Index

CWT:

11.26%

GWRS:

12.73%

Daily Std Dev

CWT:

23.46%

GWRS:

27.87%

Max Drawdown

CWT:

-38.24%

GWRS:

-51.69%

Current Drawdown

CWT:

-28.31%

GWRS:

-44.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CWT:

$2.87B

GWRS:

$287.69M

EPS

CWT:

$2.26

GWRS:

$0.23

PE Ratio

CWT:

21.31

GWRS:

45.57

PEG Ratio

CWT:

2.70

GWRS:

2.89

PS Ratio

CWT:

2.96

GWRS:

5.37

PB Ratio

CWT:

1.74

GWRS:

3.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

CWT:

$970.03M

GWRS:

$53.54M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CWT:

$532.30M

GWRS:

$36.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

CWT:

$351.41M

GWRS:

$22.63M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWT achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than GWRS's -8.34% return.


CWT

YTD

7.24%

1M

-5.13%

6M

-5.57%

1Y

-6.87%

3Y*

-1.78%

5Y*

3.20%

10Y*

9.30%

GWRS

YTD

-8.34%

1M

2.71%

6M

-18.63%

1Y

-17.78%

3Y*

-5.56%

5Y*

2.69%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


California Water Service Group

Global Water Resources, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CWT vs. GWRS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CWT is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CWT is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CWT is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CWT is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CWT is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CWT is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GWRS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GWRS is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GWRS is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GWRS is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GWRS is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GWRS is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GWRS is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CWT vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Water Service Group (CWT) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CWT Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is higher than the GWRS Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWT and GWRS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CWT vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison

CWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than GWRS's 2.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CWT
California Water Service Group
2.42%2.43%2.01%1.65%1.28%1.57%1.53%1.57%1.59%2.04%2.88%2.64%
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
2.90%2.62%2.28%2.22%1.71%2.01%2.18%2.80%2.94%1.90%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CWT vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWT drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum GWRS drawdown of -51.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWT and GWRS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CWT vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison

California Water Service Group (CWT) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) at 6.31%. This indicates that CWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CWT vs. GWRS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Water Service Group and Global Water Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20212022202320242025
203.97M
12.46M
(CWT) Total Revenue
(GWRS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CWT vs. GWRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between California Water Service Group and Global Water Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
67.0%
70.4%
(CWT) Gross Margin
(GWRS) Gross Margin
CWT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported a gross profit of 136.58M and revenue of 203.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.0%.

GWRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.77M and revenue of 12.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.4%.

CWT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported an operating income of 22.35M and revenue of 203.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

GWRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.26M and revenue of 12.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

CWT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, California Water Service Group reported a net income of 13.33M and revenue of 203.97M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

GWRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 591.00K and revenue of 12.46M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.