CWT vs. GWRS
Compare and contrast key facts about California Water Service Group (CWT) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CWT or GWRS.
Key characteristics
| CWT | GWRS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.64% | 2.72% |
| 1Y Return | 7.57% | 25.73% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.51% | -8.69% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.30% | 3.14% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.33 | 0.83 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.64 | 1.39 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.07 | 1.16 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.21 | 0.60 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.86 | 4.70 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.76% | 5.78% |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.16% | 32.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.49% | -51.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -23.93% | -30.82% |
Fundamentals
| CWT | GWRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.08B | $319.00M |
| EPS | $3.46 | $0.27 |
| PE Ratio | 14.99 | 48.78 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.70 | 2.87 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $1.03B | $51.81M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $433.58M | $33.11M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $394.23M | $18.02M |
Correlation
The correlation between CWT and GWRS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CWT vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CWT achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than GWRS's 2.72% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CWT vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for California Water Service Group (CWT) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CWT vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison
CWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than GWRS's 2.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWT California Water Service Group | 2.12% | 2.01% | 1.65% | 1.28% | 1.57% | 1.53% | 1.57% | 1.59% | 2.04% | 2.88% | 2.64% | 2.77% |
GWRS Global Water Resources, Inc. | 2.28% | 2.29% | 2.26% | 1.69% | 2.00% | 2.19% | 2.84% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CWT vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWT drawdown since its inception was -36.49%, smaller than the maximum GWRS drawdown of -51.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWT and GWRS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CWT vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for California Water Service Group (CWT) is 6.67%, while Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that CWT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CWT vs. GWRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between California Water Service Group and Global Water Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities