CWS vs. IQM
CWS (AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWS returned 8.12%/yr vs 20.13%/yr for IQM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CWS charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.
Performance
CWS vs. IQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWS achieves a -2.08% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 35.15% return.
CWS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- -2.08%
- 6M
- -3.85%
- 1Y
- -1.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- —
IQM
- 1D
- -6.20%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 35.15%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- 1Y
- 66.07%
- 3Y*
- 35.52%
- 5Y*
- 20.13%
- 10Y*
- —
CWS vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | -2.08% | 6.43% | 9.82% | 25.06% | -10.42% | 22.20% | 19.95% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 35.15% | 30.76% | 31.03% | 41.06% | -33.36% | 25.18% | 76.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWS and IQM is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between CWS and IQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CWS vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWS
IQM
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Healthcare
CWS
IQM
Industrials
CWS
IQM
Technology
CWS
IQM
Consumer Cyclical
CWS
IQM
Financial Services
CWS
IQM
-
Consumer Defensive
CWS
IQM
-
Utilities
CWS
IQM
Basic Materials
CWS
-
IQM
-
Communication Services
CWS
-
IQM
Energy
CWS
-
IQM
Real Estate
CWS
-
IQM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWS vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank
CWS
IQM
CWS vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWS | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.35 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 4.52 | -4.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 14.13 | -14.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWS vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWS drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWS and IQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWS | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.82% | -44.91% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -14.71% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.56% | -30.42% | +13.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -44.91% | +20.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -6.20% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -12.18% | +7.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 4.69% | +0.08% |
Volatility
CWS vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) is 3.70%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 15.34%. This indicates that CWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWS | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 15.34% | -11.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 26.16% | -15.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | 31.47% | -17.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 29.56% | -13.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 31.10% | -14.21% |
CWS vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWS has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWS vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison
CWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWS AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF | 0.31% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 2.07% | 0.29% | 0.03% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWS and IQM have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQM has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to CWS (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWS dropped -33.82% vs IQM's -44.91%.
On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 20.13% vs 8.12% for CWS. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 20.13% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for CWS.
CWS has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for CWS and 0.50% for IQM.
IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWS and IQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer