CWI vs. SPYG
CWI (State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CWI returned 9.70%/yr vs 17.38%/yr for SPYG. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CWI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
CWI vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CWI has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 9.70%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.
CWI
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- 13.37%
- 1Y
- 29.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.43%
SPYG
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 21.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.74M | $9.97M | $9.68M | |
| $321.11M | $273.47M | $308.09M |
CWI vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 13.37% | 32.75% | 6.27% | 15.74% | -15.39% | 8.81% | 9.83% | 21.92% | -13.83% | 26.89% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 10.06% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWI and SPYG is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2007 | 0.77 |
The correlation between CWI and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWI vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWI
SPYG
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
CWI
SPYG
Technology
CWI
SPYG
Industrials
CWI
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
CWI
SPYG
Healthcare
CWI
SPYG
Energy
CWI
SPYG
Basic Materials
CWI
SPYG
Communication Services
CWI
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
CWI
SPYG
Utilities
CWI
SPYG
Real Estate
CWI
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWI vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
CWI
SPYG
CWI vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWI | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.42 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 5.17 | +3.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWI vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWI | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | -67.63% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -13.76% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | -22.14% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.80% | -32.67% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | -32.67% | -1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -4.33% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.77% | -24.20% | +11.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.78% | -0.66% |
Volatility
CWI vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) is 5.63%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that CWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWI | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 6.08% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.27% | 14.85% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.17% | 18.18% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 21.50% | -4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 20.79% | -3.75% |
CWI vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWI vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than SPYG's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 2.72% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.65% | 2.07% | 3.05% | 2.81% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.62% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWI and SPYG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to CWI (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.38% vs 9.70% for CWI. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CWI has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.38% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.
CWI has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.49% for SPYG.
CWI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. CWI tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.04% for SPYG.
CWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWI and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer