CWI vs. IXUS
CWI (SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF) and IXUS (iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - CWI tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index while IXUS tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CWI returned 10.82%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for IXUS. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CWI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IXUS.
Performance
CWI vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CWI having a 16.41% return and IXUS slightly lower at 16.32%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CWI having a 10.82% annualized return and IXUS not far behind at 10.55%.
CWI
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 6M
- 17.00%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
IXUS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 34.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
CWI vs. IXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 16.41% | 32.75% | 6.27% | 15.74% | -15.39% | 8.81% | 9.83% | 21.92% | -13.83% | 26.89% |
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 16.32% | 32.40% | 5.19% | 15.83% | -16.47% | 8.86% | 10.80% | 21.71% | -14.41% | 28.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWI and IXUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012 | 0.98 |
The correlation between CWI and IXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWI vs. IXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWI
IXUS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
CWI
IXUS
Technology
CWI
IXUS
Industrials
CWI
IXUS
Consumer Cyclical
CWI
IXUS
Healthcare
CWI
IXUS
Basic Materials
CWI
IXUS
Energy
CWI
IXUS
Communication Services
CWI
IXUS
Consumer Defensive
CWI
IXUS
Utilities
CWI
IXUS
Real Estate
CWI
IXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWI vs. IXUS — Risk / Return Rank
CWI
IXUS
CWI vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWI | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.06 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 11.79 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWI vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than IXUS's maximum drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and IXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWI | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | -36.22% | -24.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -11.36% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | -13.75% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.80% | -30.03% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | -36.22% | +1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.83% | -7.48% | -5.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.94% | +0.04% |
Volatility
CWI vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) have volatilities of 6.51% and 6.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWI | IXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 6.43% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 14.30% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 16.28% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 16.39% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 17.10% | +0.07% |
CWI vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IXUS's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWI vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison
CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than IXUS's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 2.64% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.65% | 2.07% | 3.05% | 2.81% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.62% |
IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | 2.88% | 3.24% | 3.33% | 3.13% | 2.48% | 3.12% | 1.85% | 3.09% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 2.58% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, CWI and IXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CWI has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to IXUS (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs IXUS's -36.22%.
On 10-year performance, CWI leads with 10.82% vs 10.55% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CWI has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.
IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 2.64% for CWI.
CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.07% for IXUS.
CWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWI and IXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer