PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWI vs. IXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWI vs. IXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CWI having a 13.37% return and IXUS slightly lower at 13.14%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CWI having a 9.70% annualized return and IXUS not far behind at 9.51%.


CWI

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.10%
6M
7.85%
YTD
13.37%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
9.70%
ALL TIME*
5.43%

IXUS

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.19%
6M
7.11%
YTD
13.14%
1Y
27.79%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
9.51%
ALL TIME*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.74M$9.97M$9.68M
$147.19M$143.47M$175.73M

CWI vs. IXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWI
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
13.37%32.75%6.27%15.74%-15.39%8.81%9.83%21.92%-13.83%26.89%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
13.14%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CWI and IXUS is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.98

The correlation between CWI and IXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

CWI vs. IXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CWI
IXUS

Financial Services

18.4%
22.3%

Technology

15.6%
22.4%

Industrials

8.0%
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
7.7%

Healthcare

5.3%
6.9%

Energy

4.9%
4.3%

Basic Materials

4.3%
7.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
5.0%

Utilities

1.2%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.2%

Financial Services

CWI
18.4%
IXUS
22.3%

Technology

CWI
15.6%
IXUS
22.4%

Industrials

CWI
8.0%
IXUS
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CWI
5.4%
IXUS
7.7%

Healthcare

CWI
5.3%
IXUS
6.9%

Energy

CWI
4.9%
IXUS
4.3%

Basic Materials

CWI
4.3%
IXUS
7.0%

Communication Services

CWI
2.7%
IXUS
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

CWI
2.5%
IXUS
5.0%

Utilities

CWI
1.2%
IXUS
2.9%

Real Estate

CWI
0.9%
IXUS
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWI vs. IXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CWI
CWI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CWI vs. IXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWIIXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.41

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

8.87

+0.25

CWI vs. IXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the IXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWI and IXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWI vs. IXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than IXUS's maximum drawdown of -36.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and IXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIIXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-36.22%

-24.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-11.36%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-13.75%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-30.03%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-36.22%

+1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-2.73%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.77%

-7.45%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.08%

+0.04%

Volatility

CWI vs. IXUS - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) at 5.36%. This indicates that CWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIIXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

5.36%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.27%

15.27%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

17.08%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

16.52%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.97%

+0.07%

CWI vs. IXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IXUS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWI vs. IXUS - Dividend Comparison

CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than IXUS's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWI
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
2.72%2.97%2.89%2.80%3.17%2.65%2.07%3.05%2.81%2.29%2.45%2.62%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.97%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, CWI and IXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CWI has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to IXUS (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs IXUS's -36.22%.

On 10-year performance, CWI leads with 9.70% vs 9.51% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CWI has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 2.72% for CWI.

CWI tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA Index, while IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.07% for IXUS.

CWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWI and IXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer