PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWI vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWI vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CWI has outperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 9.65%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.


CWI

1D
-1.85%
1M
-1.61%
6M
7.64%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
25.95%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
9.65%

EFAV

1D
0.12%
1M
0.61%
6M
4.32%
YTD
5.99%
1Y
11.32%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWI vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
12.10%32.75%6.27%15.74%-15.39%8.81%9.83%21.92%-13.83%26.89%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
5.99%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CWI and EFAV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.85

The correlation between CWI and EFAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CWI vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CWI
EFAV

Financial Services

23.8%
19.4%

Technology

21.6%
4.6%

Industrials

14.4%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
5.0%

Healthcare

6.8%
12.0%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.5%

Energy

5.1%
8.3%

Communication Services

5.0%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
11.9%

Utilities

2.8%
8.8%

Real Estate

1.2%
3.0%

Financial Services

CWI
23.8%
EFAV
19.4%

Technology

CWI
21.6%
EFAV
4.6%

Industrials

CWI
14.4%
EFAV
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CWI
8.0%
EFAV
5.0%

Healthcare

CWI
6.8%
EFAV
12.0%

Basic Materials

CWI
6.6%
EFAV
1.5%

Energy

CWI
5.1%
EFAV
8.3%

Communication Services

CWI
5.0%
EFAV
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

CWI
5.0%
EFAV
11.9%

Utilities

CWI
2.8%
EFAV
8.8%

Real Estate

CWI
1.2%
EFAV
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWI vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWI
CWI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWI vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CWIEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.20

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.71

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

4.00

+4.54

CWI vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWI and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CWI vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-27.56%

-33.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-6.66%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-8.75%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-27.46%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-27.56%

-7.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-3.64%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-4.77%

-8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.83%

+0.21%

Volatility

CWI vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) at 3.44%. This indicates that CWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWIEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

3.44%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.88%

8.79%

+6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.84%

10.70%

+6.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

11.84%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

13.02%

+3.98%

CWI vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWI vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than EFAV's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
2.75%2.97%2.89%2.80%3.17%2.65%2.07%3.05%2.81%2.29%2.45%2.62%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
3.18%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWI and EFAV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWI has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to EFAV (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 10-year performance, CWI leads with 9.65% vs 6.15% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CWI has performed better with a 9.65% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.75% for CWI.

CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.20% for EFAV.

CWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWI and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer