CWEB vs. CNXT
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -46.97%/yr vs 5.14%/yr for CNXT. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CNXT.
Performance
CWEB vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -55.28% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 41.99% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- -5.35%
- 1M
- -25.71%
- YTD
- -55.28%
- 6M
- -56.43%
- 1Y
- -53.75%
- 3Y*
- -18.20%
- 5Y*
- -46.97%
- 10Y*
- —
CNXT
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 41.99%
- 6M
- 39.66%
- 1Y
- 119.78%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
CWEB vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -55.28% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 41.99% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and CNXT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CWEB and CNXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWEB vs. CNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
CNXT
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
CWEB
CNXT
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
CNXT
Healthcare
CWEB
CNXT
Real Estate
CWEB
CNXT
-
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
CNXT
Technology
CWEB
CNXT
Financial Services
CWEB
CNXT
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
CNXT
Energy
CWEB
-
CNXT
-
Industrials
CWEB
-
CNXT
Utilities
CWEB
-
CNXT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
CNXT
CWEB vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.55 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 9.87 | -10.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 29.07 | -30.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than CNXT's maximum drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and CNXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -68.98% | -29.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.36% | -12.21% | -57.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.36% | -48.60% | -20.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.85% | -61.21% | -34.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.18% | -0.13% | -98.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.67% | -42.74% | -22.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.36% | 4.14% | +31.22% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 16.01% compared to VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) at 12.73%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.01% | 12.73% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.01% | 22.50% | +18.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.08% | 32.39% | +21.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.56% | 35.55% | +59.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.53% | 31.78% | +48.75% |
CWEB vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than CNXT's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 8.12% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and CNXT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (16.01%) compared to CNXT (12.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.18% vs CNXT's -68.98%.
On 5-year performance, CNXT leads with 5.14% vs -46.97% for CWEB. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CNXT has been the lower-risk option at 12.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 5.14% return vs -46.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.
CWEB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CNXT is China Equities. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.65% for CNXT.
CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and CNXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer