CWEB vs. CURE
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%) while CURE tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -45.85%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for CURE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for CURE.
Performance
CWEB vs. CURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -52.10% return, which is significantly lower than CURE's -10.45% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -52.10%
- 6M
- -53.54%
- 1Y
- -48.20%
- 3Y*
- -16.02%
- 5Y*
- -45.85%
- 10Y*
- —
CURE
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- 35.07%
- 3Y*
- 1.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
CWEB vs. CURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -52.10% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | -10.45% | 22.55% | -8.47% | -9.40% | -20.51% | 88.30% | 5.02% | 55.66% | 2.82% | 69.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and CURE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.28 |
The correlation between CWEB and CURE shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CWEB vs. CURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
CURE
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
CWEB
CURE
-
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
CURE
-
Healthcare
CWEB
CURE
Real Estate
CWEB
CURE
-
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
CURE
-
Technology
CWEB
CURE
-
Financial Services
CWEB
CURE
-
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
CURE
-
Energy
CWEB
-
CURE
-
Industrials
CWEB
-
CURE
-
Utilities
CWEB
-
CURE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. CURE — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
CURE
CWEB vs. CURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | CURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.16 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 1.13 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 2.51 | -3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. CURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than CURE's maximum drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and CURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | CURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -69.19% | -28.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.18% | -31.10% | -36.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.18% | -51.93% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | -52.23% | -43.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.05% | -28.92% | -69.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -18.18% | -47.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.83% | 13.98% | +20.85% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. CURE - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) at 15.41%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | CURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 15.41% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.88% | 31.09% | +9.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.27% | 44.49% | +9.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.57% | 43.92% | +50.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.54% | 49.58% | +30.96% |
CWEB vs. CURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CURE's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. CURE - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than CURE's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.19% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 7.05% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and CURE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to CURE (15.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.09% vs CURE's -69.19%.
On 5-year performance, CURE leads with 0.46% vs -45.85% for CWEB. On fees, CURE is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, CURE has been the lower-risk option at 15.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CURE has performed better with a 0.46% return vs -45.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CURE is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.05%, compared with 1.19% for CURE.
CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 1.08% for CURE.
CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and CURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer