CWEB vs. CURE
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while CURE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -42.28%/yr vs 2.19%/yr for CURE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for CURE.
Performance
CWEB vs. CURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -45.40% return, which is significantly lower than CURE's 5.86% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- 6M
- -54.85%
- YTD
- -45.40%
- 1Y
- -41.53%
- 3Y*
- -16.96%
- 5Y*
- -42.28%
- 10Y*
- —
CURE
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 15.02%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 50.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.78%
CWEB vs. CURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -45.40% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 5.86% | 22.55% | -8.47% | -9.40% | -20.51% | 88.30% | 5.02% | 55.66% | 2.82% | 69.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and CURE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.28 |
The correlation between CWEB and CURE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CWEB vs. CURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
CURE
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
CWEB
CURE
-
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
CURE
-
Healthcare
CWEB
CURE
Real Estate
CWEB
CURE
-
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
CURE
-
Technology
CWEB
CURE
-
Financial Services
CWEB
CURE
-
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
CURE
-
Energy
CWEB
-
CURE
-
Industrials
CWEB
-
CURE
-
Utilities
CWEB
-
CURE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. CURE — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
CURE
CWEB vs. CURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | CURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.20 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 1.63 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 3.63 | -4.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. CURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than CURE's maximum drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and CURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | CURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -69.19% | -28.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.36% | -31.10% | -38.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.36% | -51.93% | -17.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.78% | -52.23% | -42.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.78% | -15.97% | -81.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.82% | -18.17% | -47.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.85% | 13.93% | +23.92% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. CURE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) is 15.57%, while Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that CWEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | CURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.57% | 16.89% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.03% | 33.63% | +7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.12% | 46.46% | +8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.34% | 44.39% | +49.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.43% | 49.69% | +30.74% |
CWEB vs. CURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CURE's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. CURE - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than CURE's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.07% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.65% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and CURE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CURE has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to CWEB (15.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.18% vs CURE's -69.19%.
On 5-year performance, CURE leads with 2.19% vs -42.28% for CWEB. On fees, CURE is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, CWEB has been the lower-risk option at 15.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CURE has performed better with a 2.19% return vs -42.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CURE is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 1.07% for CURE.
CWEB is categorized as China Equities, while CURE is Leveraged Equities. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 1.08% for CURE.
CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and CURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer