CWEB vs. FXI
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds - CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%) while FXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -34.28%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FXI. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
CWEB vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -36.03% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's -3.96% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- 28.79%
- 6M
- -39.78%
- YTD
- -36.03%
- 1Y
- -33.46%
- 3Y*
- -15.58%
- 5Y*
- -34.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -19.66%
FXI
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 14.38%
- 6M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -3.96%
- 1Y
- 0.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.22M | $13.80M | $17.15M | |
| $773.89M | $798.32M | $975.73M |
CWEB vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -36.03% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -3.96% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and FXI is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CWEB and FXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWEB vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
FXI
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
CWEB
FXI
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
FXI
Healthcare
CWEB
FXI
Technology
CWEB
FXI
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
FXI
Real Estate
CWEB
FXI
Financial Services
CWEB
FXI
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
FXI
Energy
CWEB
-
FXI
Industrials
CWEB
-
FXI
Utilities
CWEB
-
FXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
FXI
CWEB vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.01 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.03 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | -0.07 | -0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than FXI's maximum drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -72.68% | -25.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.36% | -22.94% | -46.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.36% | -26.62% | -42.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.51% | -49.88% | -42.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.39% | -24.37% | -73.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.00% | -31.21% | -34.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.38% | 10.00% | +30.38% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 5.14%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.76% | 5.14% | +10.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.53% | 14.61% | +26.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.64% | 20.32% | +35.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.18% | 31.44% | +61.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.32% | 27.60% | +52.72% |
CWEB vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than FXI's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 5.68% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 1.86% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and FXI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (15.76%) compared to FXI (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.18% vs FXI's -72.68%.
On 5-year performance, FXI leads with 0.26% vs -34.28% for CWEB. On fees, FXI is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXI has performed better with a 0.26% return vs -34.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXI is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 1.86% for FXI.
CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.74% for FXI.
FXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer