CWEB vs. FXI
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -44.50%/yr vs -3.64%/yr for FXI. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
CWEB vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -48.33% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's -11.46% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- -3.88%
- 1M
- -19.06%
- YTD
- -48.33%
- 6M
- -47.63%
- 1Y
- -46.56%
- 3Y*
- -19.47%
- 5Y*
- -44.50%
- 10Y*
- —
FXI
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- -6.24%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.43%
- 1Y
- -5.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- -3.64%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
CWEB vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -48.33% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -11.46% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and FXI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CWEB and FXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWEB vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
FXI
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
CWEB
FXI
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
FXI
Healthcare
CWEB
FXI
Real Estate
CWEB
FXI
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
FXI
Technology
CWEB
FXI
Financial Services
CWEB
FXI
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
FXI
Energy
CWEB
-
FXI
Industrials
CWEB
-
FXI
Utilities
CWEB
-
FXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
FXI
CWEB vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.97 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.30 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | -0.69 | -0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than FXI's maximum drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -72.68% | -25.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.59% | -17.91% | -46.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.59% | -28.72% | -35.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | -54.94% | -40.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.90% | -30.27% | -67.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.60% | -31.21% | -34.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.08% | 7.86% | +26.22% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 5.82%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 5.82% | +10.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.73% | 14.58% | +26.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.28% | 19.97% | +34.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.53% | 31.70% | +62.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.58% | 27.67% | +52.91% |
CWEB vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than FXI's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.53% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.02% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and FXI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to FXI (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.09% vs FXI's -72.68%.
On 5-year performance, FXI leads with -3.64% vs -44.50% for CWEB. On fees, FXI is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXI has performed better with a -3.64% return vs -44.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXI is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 2.02% for FXI.
CWEB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FXI is China Equities. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.74% for FXI.
FXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer