CWB vs. HGER
CWB (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWB is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond, while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CWB returned 14.79%/yr vs 19.08%/yr for HGER. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWB charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.
Performance
CWB vs. HGER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWB achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 28.53% return.
CWB
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- YTD
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.57%
HGER
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- YTD
- 28.53%
- 1Y
- 37.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.35%
CWB vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 14.96% | 16.61% | 10.06% | 14.49% | -16.37% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 28.53% | 20.08% | 9.25% | 1.93% | 9.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWB and HGER is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWB vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank
CWB
HGER
CWB vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWB | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 2.71 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 9.68 | -1.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWB vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWB drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWB and HGER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWB | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -23.31% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -14.04% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.92% | -14.04% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -4.69% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -7.69% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.93% | -1.26% |
Volatility
CWB vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) is 5.19%, while Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that CWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWB | HGER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 6.11% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 15.51% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 17.57% | -1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.33% | 17.68% | -4.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.62% | 17.68% | -3.06% |
CWB vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWB vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison
CWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than HGER's 5.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% |
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF | 5.51% | 7.09% | 3.28% | 7.24% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWB and HGER have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HGER has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to CWB (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWB dropped -32.06% vs HGER's -23.31%.
On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 19.08% vs 14.79% for CWB. On fees, CWB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, CWB has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 19.08% return vs 14.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CWB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.
HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 1.45% for CWB.
CWB is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while HGER is Commodities. CWB tracks Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CWB and 0.68% for HGER.
HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWB and HGER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer