CVRD vs. SPXM
CVRD (Madison Covered Call ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVRD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Madison, while SPXM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Azoria. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CVRD returned 3.05% vs 8.61% for SPXM. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CVRD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
CVRD vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CVRD
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVRD vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF | 0.89% | 2.51% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVRD and SPXM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVRD vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
CVRD
SPXM
CVRD vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVRD | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 2.09 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.41 | 9.77 | -8.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVRD vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVRD drawdown since its inception was -17.95%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRD and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVRD | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -5.08% | -12.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.72% | -5.08% | -0.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -0.75% | -2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.06% | -0.78% | -1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | — | — |
Volatility
CVRD vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that CVRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVRD | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 0.00% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.13% | 3.96% | +3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.71% | 7.66% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 7.63% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 7.63% | +4.10% |
CVRD vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVRD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVRD vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
CVRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF | 7.82% | 7.63% | 15.70% | 1.50% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVRD and SPXM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVRD has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRD dropped -17.95% vs SPXM's -5.08%.
On 1-year performance, SPXM leads with 8.61% vs 3.05% for CVRD. On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPXM has performed better with a 8.61% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CVRD.
CVRD has the higher dividend yield at 7.82%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
CVRD is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPXM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Madison and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CVRD and 0.47% for SPXM.
SPXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVRD and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer