CVRD vs. PUTW
CVRD (Madison Covered Call ETF) and PUTW (WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund) are both Derivative Income funds. CVRD is actively managed, while PUTW is passively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CVRD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for PUTW.
Performance
CVRD vs. PUTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CVRD
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.31%
PUTW
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $200.69K | $121.43K | $50.76K |
CVRD vs. PUTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF | 2.84% | 5.94% | 4.90% | 4.74% |
PUTW WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund | 0.00% | -2.80% | 17.19% | 3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVRD and PUTW is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVRD vs. PUTW — Risk / Return Rank
CVRD
PUTW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CVRD vs. PUTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CVRD | PUTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CVRD vs. PUTW - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVRD | PUTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility
CVRD vs. PUTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVRD | PUTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.81% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.68% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.68% | — | — |
CVRD vs. PUTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVRD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PUTW's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVRD vs. PUTW - Dividend Comparison
CVRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, while PUTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF | 7.67% | 7.63% | 15.70% | 1.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PUTW WisdomTree PutWrite Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 4.16% | 11.99% | 7.63% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 5.49% | 3.33% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVRD and PUTW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PUTW is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PUTW is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CVRD.
CVRD has the higher dividend yield at 7.67%, compared with 0.00% for PUTW.
They also come from different issuers: Madison and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CVRD and 0.44% for PUTW.
Find the right allocation for CVRD and PUTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer