PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CVRD vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CVRDBDGS
YTD Return4.88%12.74%
1Y Return7.82%19.12%
Sharpe Ratio0.922.89
Daily Std Dev8.21%6.58%
Max Drawdown-6.47%-5.38%
Current Drawdown-0.04%-0.15%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CVRD and BDGS is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CVRD vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CVRD achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 12.74% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.01%
10.64%
CVRD
BDGS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVRD vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
Expense ratio chart for CVRD: current value at 0.90% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.90%
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CVRD vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVRD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CVRD, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CVRD, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CVRD, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CVRD, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CVRD, currently valued at 4.27, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.27
BDGS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 4.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.88
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 21.35, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0021.35

CVRD vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CVRD and BDGS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00Aug 25Tue 27Thu 29Sat 31Mon 02Wed 04Fri 06Sep 08Tue 10Thu 12Sat 14Mon 16Wed 18
0.92
2.89
CVRD
BDGS

Dividends

CVRD vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

CVRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.70%, more than BDGS's 0.74% yield.


TTM2023
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
11.70%0.53%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.74%0.84%

Drawdowns

CVRD vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRD drawdown since its inception was -6.47%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRD and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-0.04%
-0.15%
CVRD
BDGS

Volatility

CVRD vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) has a higher volatility of 1.90% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.68%. This indicates that CVRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.90%
0.68%
CVRD
BDGS