CVRD vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CVRD (Madison Covered Call ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVRD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Madison, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. CVRD is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, CVRD returned 4.44% vs 22.55% for QYLD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVRD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

CVRD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVRD achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.89% return.

CVRD

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -4.20%
• YTD: -1.00%
• 6M: -0.80%
• 1Y: 4.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 7.59%
• 1Y: 22.55%
• 3Y*: 13.99%
• 5Y*: 8.26%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVRD vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF	-1.00%	5.94%	4.90%	4.74%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.89%	9.28%	19.35%	4.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CVRD and QYLD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	0.55

The correlation between CVRD and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVRD vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CVRD	QYLD
Technology	38.6%	58.7%
Financial Services	10.4%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	9.3%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	11.4%
Communication Services	7.5%	14.3%
Industrials	7.2%	2.6%
Healthcare	7.2%	3.7%
Energy	6.1%	0.5%
Real Estate	3.0%	0.1%
Basic Materials	2.3%	1.0%
Utilities	2.2%	1.2%

Return for Risk

CVRD vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVRD

CVRD Risk / Return Rank: 17
CVRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CVRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CVRD Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CVRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CVRD Martin Ratio Rank: 20

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 84
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVRD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVRD	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	2.34	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	3.28	-2.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.52	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	4.56	-3.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.30	25.38	-23.08

CVRD vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVRD and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVRD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVRD drawdown since its inception was -17.95%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRD and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVRD	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.95%	-24.75%	+6.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.72%	-4.97%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.14%	-2.10%	-3.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-3.82%	+1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	0.89%	+1.04%

Volatility

CVRD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) is 2.74%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that CVRD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVRD	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.74%	4.78%	-2.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.12%	8.50%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.65%	9.70%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.78%	14.84%	-3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.78%	15.56%	-3.78%

CVRD vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVRD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVRD vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

CVRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, less than QYLD's 11.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF	7.83%	7.63%	15.70%	1.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.68%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVRD and QYLD in my portfolio?

CVRD and QYLD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVRD or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to CVRD (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRD dropped -17.95% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, CVRD or QYLD?

On 1-year performance, QYLD leads with 22.55% vs 4.44% for CVRD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CVRD has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVRD or QYLD?

Over the 1-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 22.55% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVRD or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CVRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVRD or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.68%, compared with 7.83% for CVRD.

What is the main difference between CVRD and QYLD?

CVRD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Madison and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CVRD and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.