PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVNY vs. QRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CVNY vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CVNY vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -23.28% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's -2.50% return.


CVNY

1D
-0.36%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
-23.28%
6M
-17.45%
1Y
40.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QRMI

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
1.31%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVNY vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CVNY vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVNY
CVNY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CVNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNY Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVNY vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVNYQRMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

0.36

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

0.55

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.08

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

0.55

+0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.12

1.59

+1.53

CVNY vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNY and QRMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVNYQRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.36

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.09

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between CVNY and QRMI is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CVNY vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 121.31%, more than QRMI's 12.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CVNY
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF
121.31%80.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.66%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%

Drawdowns

CVNY vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and QRMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CVNYQRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.27%

-20.95%

-22.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.27%

-5.04%

-31.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.96%

-3.54%

-27.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.33%

-8.25%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.56%

1.74%

+11.82%

Volatility

CVNY vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 3.02%. This indicates that CVNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CVNYQRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.54%

3.02%

+11.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.12%

4.93%

+35.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.67%

7.77%

+48.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.96%

8.46%

+51.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.96%

8.46%

+51.50%