PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVNY vs. MSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVNY vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -16.60% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.


CVNY

1D
-0.89%
1M
4.17%
6M
-22.71%
YTD
-16.60%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTZ

1D
-1.53%
1M
39.32%
6M
-19.19%
YTD
-26.97%
1Y
264.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVNY vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CVNY and MSTZ is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025

-0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVNY vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVNY
CVNY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CVNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTZ
MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVNY vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVNYMSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.30

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

2.86

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

5.59

-5.48

CVNY vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNY and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVNY vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and MSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVNYMSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.27%

-99.38%

+56.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.27%

-84.89%

+48.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.95%

-97.51%

+72.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.22%

-94.53%

+80.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.72%

43.41%

-25.69%

Volatility

CVNY vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) is 14.64%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that CVNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVNYMSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.64%

56.46%

-41.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.82%

135.20%

-98.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.01%

148.41%

-98.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.54%

171.17%

-113.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.54%

171.17%

-113.63%

CVNY vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVNY vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 112.08%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CVNY and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to CVNY (14.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVNY dropped -43.27% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 2.35% for CVNY. On fees, CVNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, CVNY has been the lower-risk option at 14.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

CVNY has the higher dividend yield at 112.08%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

CVNY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CVNY and 1.05% for MSTZ.

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVNY and MSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer