CVMC vs. XJH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CVMC (Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - CVMC tracks the Russell Midcap Index while XJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVMC returned 16.39%/yr vs 15.83%/yr for XJH. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CVMC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XJH.

Performance

CVMC vs. XJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than XJH's 14.60% return.

CVMC

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 16.76%
• 6M: 15.31%
• 1Y: 26.59%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XJH

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 3.19%
• YTD: 14.60%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: 26.24%
• 3Y*: 15.83%
• 5Y*: 7.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVMC vs. XJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	16.76%	9.52%	12.57%	6.14%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	14.60%	8.12%	12.27%	6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMC and XJH is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023	0.96

The correlation between CVMC and XJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVMC vs. XJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CVMC	XJH
Technology	23.4%	16.7%
Industrials	19.9%	26.8%
Financial Services	12.2%	14.0%
Healthcare	10.0%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	9.6%
Real Estate	6.8%	8.1%
Utilities	5.4%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	4.2%
Basic Materials	2.9%	5.0%
Communication Services	2.7%	1.1%
Energy	1.2%	2.9%

Return for Risk

CVMC vs. XJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVMC

CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 62
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

XJH

XJH Risk / Return Rank: 53
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 45
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVMC vs. XJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVMC	XJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.59	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.32	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.27	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	2.74	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.43	10.10	+1.34

CVMC vs. XJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the XJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMC and XJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVMC vs. XJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum XJH drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and XJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVMC	XJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.53%	-25.07%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	-9.61%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.53%	-24.56%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-0.80%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-6.77%	+2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	2.61%	-0.28%

Volatility

CVMC vs. XJH - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) have volatilities of 5.04% and 4.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVMC	XJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	4.85%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.15%	12.34%	-1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.46%	16.64%	-2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	19.96%	-3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	19.87%	-3.33%

CVMC vs. XJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XJH's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CVMC vs. XJH - Dividend Comparison

CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than XJH's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	1.20%	1.39%	1.21%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	1.09%	1.24%	1.24%	1.38%	1.45%	1.04%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVMC and XJH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, CVMC and XJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CVMC or XJH?

CVMC has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to XJH (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs XJH's -25.07%.

Which ETF is better, CVMC or XJH?

On 3-year performance, CVMC leads with 16.39% vs 15.83% for XJH. On fees, XJH is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVMC or XJH?

Over the 3-year period, CVMC has performed better with a 16.39% return vs 15.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVMC or XJH?

XJH is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVMC or XJH?

CVMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.09% for XJH.

What is the main difference between CVMC and XJH?

CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index, while XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.12% for XJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.