CVMC vs. XJH
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH).
CVMC and XJH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CVMC is a passively managed fund by Calvert that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2023. XJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020. Both CVMC and XJH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CVMC vs. XJH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CVMC vs. XJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 1.05% | 9.52% | 12.57% | 4.40% |
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 2.75% | 8.12% | 12.27% | 4.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than XJH's 2.75% return.
CVMC
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XJH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CVMC vs. XJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XJH's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CVMC vs. XJH — Risk / Return Rank
CVMC
XJH
CVMC vs. XJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVMC | XJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.85 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.33 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 5.54 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVMC | XJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.85 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.67 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between CVMC and XJH is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CVMC vs. XJH - Dividend Comparison
CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than XJH's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.21% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 1.04% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
CVMC vs. XJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum XJH drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and XJH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVMC | XJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.53% | -25.07% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | -14.02% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.87% | -5.95% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -6.99% | +2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.37% | -0.32% |
Volatility
CVMC vs. XJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) is 5.72%, while iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that CVMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CVMC | XJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 6.71% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 12.27% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 21.39% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 19.89% | -3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 19.99% | -3.45% |