CVMC vs. IJH
CVMC (Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - CVMC tracks the Russell Midcap Index while IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVMC returned 16.44%/yr vs 16.09%/yr for IJH. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CVMC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
CVMC vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly higher than IJH's 14.10% return.
CVMC
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJH
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 25.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
CVMC vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 15.51% | 9.52% | 12.57% | 4.40% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.10% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVMC and IJH is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between CVMC and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
CVMC vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVMC
IJH
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
CVMC
IJH
Industrials
CVMC
IJH
Financial Services
CVMC
IJH
Healthcare
CVMC
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
CVMC
IJH
Real Estate
CVMC
IJH
Utilities
CVMC
IJH
Consumer Defensive
CVMC
IJH
Communication Services
CVMC
IJH
Basic Materials
CVMC
IJH
Energy
CVMC
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVMC vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
CVMC
IJH
CVMC vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVMC | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 1.65 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 2.41 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.90 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | 10.60 | +0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVMC | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.65 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.46 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
CVMC vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVMC | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.53% | -55.07% | +32.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -8.83% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.53% | -24.10% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -0.12% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -7.57% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.41% | -0.09% |
Volatility
CVMC vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) is 3.95%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that CVMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVMC | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 4.37% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.51% | 11.32% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 15.54% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 19.74% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 21.18% | -4.72% |
CVMC vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CVMC vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, which matches IJH's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 1.17% | 1.39% | 1.21% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, CVMC and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJH has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to CVMC (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 3-year performance, CVMC leads with 16.44% vs 16.09% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, CVMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CVMC has performed better with a 16.44% return vs 16.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVMC.
CVMC and IJH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.17%.
CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.05% for IJH.
CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVMC and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer