CVMC vs. FTDS
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS).
CVMC and FTDS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CVMC is a passively managed fund by Calvert that tracks the performance of the Russell Midcap Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2023. FTDS is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Dividend Strength Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2006. Both CVMC and FTDS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CVMC vs. FTDS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CVMC vs. FTDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 0.08% | 9.52% | 12.57% | 4.40% |
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 7.34% | 13.64% | 11.12% | 3.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than FTDS's 7.34% return.
CVMC
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTDS
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 20.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CVMC vs. FTDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTDS's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CVMC vs. FTDS — Risk / Return Rank
CVMC
FTDS
CVMC vs. FTDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVMC | FTDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.15 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.74 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.66 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 7.46 | -2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVMC | FTDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.15 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.32 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between CVMC and FTDS is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CVMC vs. FTDS - Dividend Comparison
CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FTDS's 1.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.21% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTDS First Trust Dividend Strength ETF | 1.64% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
CVMC vs. FTDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum FTDS drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and FTDS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVMC | FTDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.53% | -56.53% | +34.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | -12.98% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -3.74% | -3.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -9.92% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 2.89% | +0.14% |
Volatility
CVMC vs. FTDS - Volatility Comparison
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) at 2.94%. This indicates that CVMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CVMC | FTDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 2.94% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.51% | 9.68% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.89% | 17.99% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 17.65% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 20.14% | -3.60% |