CVMC vs. EUSA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CVMC (Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - CVMC tracks the Russell Midcap Index while EUSA tracks the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVMC returned 16.39%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for EUSA. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CVMC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for EUSA.

Performance

CVMC vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than EUSA's 9.00% return.

CVMC

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 16.76%
• 6M: 15.31%
• 1Y: 26.59%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EUSA

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 9.00%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 17.10%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: 7.57%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVMC vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	16.76%	9.52%	12.57%	6.14%
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	9.00%	10.24%	14.64%	8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMC and EUSA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023	0.98

The correlation between CVMC and EUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVMC vs. EUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CVMC	EUSA
Technology	23.4%	20.3%
Industrials	19.9%	15.3%
Financial Services	12.2%	14.7%
Healthcare	10.0%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	11.1%
Real Estate	6.8%	5.2%
Utilities	5.4%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	5.3%
Basic Materials	2.9%	4.3%
Communication Services	2.7%	4.0%
Energy	1.2%	3.8%

Return for Risk

CVMC vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVMC

CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 62
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

EUSA

EUSA Risk / Return Rank: 44
EUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
EUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVMC vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVMC	EUSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.42	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.06	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.25	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	2.20	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.43	8.64	+2.80

CVMC vs. EUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the EUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMC and EUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVMC vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum EUSA drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and EUSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVMC	EUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.53%	-39.16%	+16.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	-7.82%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.53%	-18.20%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-1.58%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-4.58%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	1.98%	+0.35%

Volatility

CVMC vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) at 3.78%. This indicates that CVMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVMC	EUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	3.78%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.15%	9.11%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.46%	12.09%	+2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	16.99%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	18.32%	-1.78%

CVMC vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CVMC vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison

CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than EUSA's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	1.20%	1.39%	1.21%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF	1.48%	1.63%	1.47%	1.53%	1.73%	1.23%	1.45%	1.49%	2.01%	1.50%	1.59%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVMC and EUSA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, CVMC and EUSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CVMC or EUSA?

CVMC has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to EUSA (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs EUSA's -39.16%.

Which ETF is better, CVMC or EUSA?

On 3-year performance, CVMC leads with 16.39% vs 15.57% for EUSA. On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVMC or EUSA?

Over the 3-year period, CVMC has performed better with a 16.39% return vs 15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVMC or EUSA?

EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVMC or EUSA?

EUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.20% for CVMC.

What is the main difference between CVMC and EUSA?

CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index, while EUSA tracks MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.09% for EUSA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.