CVLC vs. VOTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CVLC (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and VOTE (Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CVLC tracks the Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross while VOTE tracks the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVLC returned 22.30%/yr vs 22.81%/yr for VOTE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOTE.

Performance

CVLC vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than VOTE's 11.03% return.

CVLC

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 5.88%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 12.15%
• 1Y: 29.31%
• 3Y*: 22.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOTE

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 6M: 11.00%
• 1Y: 28.11%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVLC vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	12.35%	16.13%	24.20%	17.14%
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	11.03%	17.95%	25.23%	18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and VOTE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.98

The correlation between CVLC and VOTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVLC vs. VOTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CVLC	VOTE
Technology	39.5%	35.5%
Financial Services	11.8%	11.7%
Industrials	9.9%	8.5%
Healthcare	9.1%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	10.2%
Communication Services	8.5%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.8%
Real Estate	2.7%	1.8%
Utilities	2.2%	2.3%
Basic Materials	2.1%	1.8%
Energy	0.5%	3.6%

Return for Risk

CVLC vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLC

CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 70
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

VOTE

VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 69
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLC vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CVLC	VOTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.34	+0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.19	+0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.42	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	3.10	-0.04
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.09	14.23	-0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CVLC vs. VOTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the VOTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and VOTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CVLC	VOTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.34	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.37	0.80	+0.57

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum VOTE drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and VOTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVLC	VOTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-25.71%	+5.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-9.10%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.92%	-19.08%	-0.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.70%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-6.14%	+3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	1.98%	+0.11%

Volatility

CVLC vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) at 2.96%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVLC	VOTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	2.96%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	9.20%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.51%	12.08%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.55%	17.15%	-1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.55%	17.15%	-1.60%

CVLC vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CVLC vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than VOTE's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	0.89%	1.02%	1.03%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%
VOTE Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF	0.90%	1.03%	1.18%	1.33%	1.54%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVLC and VOTE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, CVLC and VOTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CVLC or VOTE?

CVLC has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to VOTE (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs VOTE's -25.71%.

Which ETF is better, CVLC or VOTE?

On 3-year performance, VOTE leads with 22.81% vs 22.30% for CVLC. On fees, VOTE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOTE has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVLC or VOTE?

Over the 3-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 22.81% return vs 22.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVLC or VOTE?

VOTE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVLC or VOTE?

CVLC and VOTE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.89%.

What is the main difference between CVLC and VOTE?

CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VOTE tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Engine No. 1 LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.05% for VOTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.