PortfoliosLab logo
CVLC vs. KLIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and KLIP is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

CVLC vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
39.27%
17.11%
CVLC
KLIP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CVLC:

0.62

KLIP:

0.17

Sortino Ratio

CVLC:

0.99

KLIP:

0.36

Omega Ratio

CVLC:

1.15

KLIP:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

CVLC:

0.63

KLIP:

0.18

Martin Ratio

CVLC:

2.44

KLIP:

0.66

Ulcer Index

CVLC:

5.16%

KLIP:

5.17%

Daily Std Dev

CVLC:

20.33%

KLIP:

20.66%

Max Drawdown

CVLC:

-19.92%

KLIP:

-18.61%

Current Drawdown

CVLC:

-8.22%

KLIP:

-5.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than KLIP's 4.11% return.


CVLC

YTD

-4.27%

1M

12.11%

6M

-1.32%

1Y

10.71%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

KLIP

YTD

4.11%

1M

5.82%

6M

5.38%

1Y

2.20%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVLC vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for KLIP: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
KLIP: 0.95%
Expense ratio chart for CVLC: current value is 0.15%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CVLC: 0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CVLC vs. KLIP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CVLC is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CVLC is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CVLC is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CVLC is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CVLC is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CVLC is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

KLIP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLIP is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CVLC vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
CVLC: 0.62
KLIP: 0.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
CVLC: 0.99
KLIP: 0.36
The chart of Omega ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
CVLC: 1.15
KLIP: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
CVLC: 0.63
KLIP: 0.18
The chart of Martin ratio for CVLC, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
CVLC: 2.44
KLIP: 0.66

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.62
0.17
CVLC
KLIP

Dividends

CVLC vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than KLIP's 42.56% yield.


Drawdowns

CVLC vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and KLIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.22%
-5.28%
CVLC
KLIP

Volatility

CVLC vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) have volatilities of 14.47% and 14.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
14.47%
14.11%
CVLC
KLIP