PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLC vs. CDEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVLC vs. CDEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than CDEI's 8.20% return.


CVLC

1D
-1.42%
1M
0.19%
YTD
10.46%
6M
9.54%
1Y
26.31%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
10Y*

CDEI

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.48%
1Y
24.61%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVLC vs. CDEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
10.46%16.13%24.20%19.04%
CDEI
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF
8.20%16.60%18.67%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and CDEI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.97

The correlation between CVLC and CDEI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVLC vs. CDEI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVLC
CDEI

Technology

39.8%
44.4%

Financial Services

12.0%
14.4%

Industrials

10.2%
4.7%

Healthcare

9.2%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
6.4%

Communication Services

8.7%
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.3%

Utilities

1.7%
2.0%

Energy

0.4%
0.4%

Technology

CVLC
39.8%
CDEI
44.4%

Financial Services

CVLC
12.0%
CDEI
14.4%

Industrials

CVLC
10.2%
CDEI
4.7%

Healthcare

CVLC
9.2%
CDEI
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CVLC
8.8%
CDEI
6.4%

Communication Services

CVLC
8.7%
CDEI
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

CVLC
4.6%
CDEI
4.5%

Real Estate

CVLC
2.7%
CDEI
1.5%

Basic Materials

CVLC
2.0%
CDEI
0.3%

Utilities

CVLC
1.7%
CDEI
2.0%

Energy

CVLC
0.4%
CDEI
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVLC vs. CDEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLC
CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CDEI
CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLC vs. CDEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVLCCDEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.50

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

10.74

+1.60

CVLC vs. CDEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the CDEI Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and CDEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. CDEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, roughly equal to the maximum CDEI drawdown of -19.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and CDEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLCCDEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-19.46%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-9.88%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-19.46%

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-1.64%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-2.27%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.30%

-0.16%

Volatility

CVLC vs. CDEI - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) at 4.22%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVLCCDEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

4.22%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

9.79%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

12.41%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

15.08%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

15.08%

+0.57%

CVLC vs. CDEI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CDEI's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CVLC vs. CDEI - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than CDEI's 1.01% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, CVLC and CDEI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVLC has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to CDEI (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs CDEI's -19.46%.

On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 20.91% vs 18.24% for CDEI. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, CDEI has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 20.91% return vs 18.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVLC.

CDEI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.93% for CVLC.

CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CDEI tracks Russell 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.14% for CDEI.

CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVLC and CDEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer