PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLC vs. ESGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVLC vs. ESGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly higher than ESGU's 10.36% return.


CVLC

1D
0.62%
1M
0.02%
6M
10.73%
YTD
11.99%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.58%

ESGU

1D
0.71%
1M
0.15%
6M
9.05%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.45M$3.31M$2.99M
$80.49M$59.39M$71.31M

CVLC vs. ESGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
11.99%16.13%24.20%19.04%
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
10.36%16.90%24.31%18.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and ESGU is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.98

The correlation between CVLC and ESGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVLC vs. ESGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVLC
ESGU

Technology

38.1%
38.6%

Financial Services

13.2%
11.6%

Industrials

10.2%
8.7%

Healthcare

10.0%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
9.0%

Communication Services

7.4%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.3%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.0%

Basic Materials

2.6%
1.9%

Utilities

2.3%
1.9%

Energy

0.4%
3.3%

Technology

CVLC
38.1%
ESGU
38.6%

Financial Services

CVLC
13.2%
ESGU
11.6%

Industrials

CVLC
10.2%
ESGU
8.7%

Healthcare

CVLC
10.0%
ESGU
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CVLC
8.0%
ESGU
9.0%

Communication Services

CVLC
7.4%
ESGU
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

CVLC
4.7%
ESGU
4.3%

Real Estate

CVLC
2.8%
ESGU
2.0%

Basic Materials

CVLC
2.6%
ESGU
1.9%

Utilities

CVLC
2.3%
ESGU
1.9%

Energy

CVLC
0.4%
ESGU
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVLC vs. ESGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVLC
CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGU
ESGU Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ESGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVLC vs. ESGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVLCESGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.13

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

8.95

+0.97

CVLC vs. ESGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the ESGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and ESGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. ESGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum ESGU drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and ESGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLCESGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-33.87%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-9.26%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-19.32%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.42%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-4.84%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.20%

-0.02%

Volatility

CVLC vs. ESGU - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVLCESGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.62%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

10.31%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

13.15%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

17.44%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

18.54%

-2.99%

CVLC vs. ESGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CVLC and ESGU have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CVLC vs. ESGU - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than ESGU's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
0.92%1.02%1.03%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
0.94%0.99%1.18%1.43%1.58%1.06%1.27%1.32%1.73%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CVLC and ESGU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVLC has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to ESGU (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs ESGU's -33.87%.

On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 19.34% vs 19.00% for ESGU. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 19.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVLC and ESGU have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

ESGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.92% for CVLC.

CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and iShares.

CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVLC and ESGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer