CVLC vs. USL
CVLC (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - CVLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVLC returned 22.60%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for USL. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
CVLC vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.
CVLC
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 31.25%
- 3Y*
- 22.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 60.58%
- 6M
- 58.21%
- 1Y
- 56.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 17.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
CVLC vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 13.18% | 16.13% | 24.20% | 17.14% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 60.58% | -12.37% | 8.30% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVLC and USL is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CVLC and USL has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
CVLC vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVLC
USL
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
CVLC
USL
-
Financial Services
CVLC
USL
Industrials
CVLC
USL
-
Healthcare
CVLC
USL
-
Consumer Cyclical
CVLC
USL
-
Communication Services
CVLC
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
CVLC
USL
-
Real Estate
CVLC
USL
-
Utilities
CVLC
USL
-
Basic Materials
CVLC
USL
-
Energy
CVLC
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVLC vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
CVLC
USL
CVLC vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVLC | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 2.00 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.46 | 2.54 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.33 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.67 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.18 | 7.44 | +7.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVLC | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.00 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.01 | +1.38 |
Drawdowns
CVLC vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVLC | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -89.06% | +69.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -16.76% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | -23.33% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -39.10% | +39.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -61.46% | +59.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 8.26% | -6.17% |
Volatility
CVLC vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) is 3.30%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that CVLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVLC | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 11.15% | -7.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 23.30% | -13.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 28.65% | -16.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 30.07% | -14.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 32.35% | -16.80% |
CVLC vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVLC vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 0.89% | 1.02% | 1.03% | 0.91% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVLC and USL have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to CVLC (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 22.60% vs 17.81% for USL. On fees, CVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CVLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 22.60% return vs 17.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
CVLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
CVLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.88% for USL.
CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVLC and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer