PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLC vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVLC vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.


CVLC

1D
0.32%
1M
6.11%
YTD
13.18%
6M
13.39%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
22.60%
5Y*
10Y*

USL

1D
1.21%
1M
0.73%
YTD
60.58%
6M
58.21%
1Y
56.66%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVLC vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
13.18%16.13%24.20%17.14%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
60.58%-12.37%8.30%2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and USL is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CVLC and USL has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

CVLC vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVLC
USL

Technology

39.5%

-

Financial Services

11.8%
4.5%

Industrials

9.9%

-

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%

-

Communication Services

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Technology

CVLC
39.5%
USL

-

Financial Services

CVLC
11.8%
USL
4.5%

Industrials

CVLC
9.9%
USL

-

Healthcare

CVLC
9.1%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

CVLC
8.7%
USL

-

Communication Services

CVLC
8.5%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

CVLC
4.6%
USL

-

Real Estate

CVLC
2.7%
USL

-

Utilities

CVLC
2.2%
USL

-

Basic Materials

CVLC
2.1%
USL

-

Energy

CVLC
0.5%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVLC vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLC
CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLC vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVLCUSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.00

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

2.54

+0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.67

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.18

7.44

+7.74

CVLC vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVLCUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.00

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.39

0.01

+1.38

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLCUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-89.06%

+69.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-16.76%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-23.33%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-39.10%

+39.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-61.46%

+59.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

8.26%

-6.17%

Volatility

CVLC vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) is 3.30%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that CVLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVLCUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

11.15%

-7.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

23.30%

-13.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

28.65%

-16.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

30.07%

-14.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

32.35%

-16.80%

CVLC vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVLC vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
0.89%1.02%1.03%0.91%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVLC and USL have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to CVLC (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 22.60% vs 17.81% for USL. On fees, CVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CVLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 22.60% return vs 17.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

CVLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

CVLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.88% for USL.

CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVLC and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer