PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLC vs. UNOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVLC vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 6.92% return.


CVLC

1D
1.46%
1M
1.48%
6M
11.48%
YTD
13.62%
1Y
25.31%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.03%

UNOV

1D
0.67%
1M
1.37%
6M
5.74%
YTD
6.92%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.52M$3.35M$3.05M
$167.14K$174.47K$1.54M

CVLC vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
13.62%16.13%24.20%19.04%
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
6.92%9.92%9.42%10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and UNOV is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.90

The correlation between CVLC and UNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVLC vs. UNOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVLC
UNOV

Technology

38.1%
37.9%

Financial Services

13.2%
11.7%

Industrials

10.2%
8.4%

Healthcare

10.0%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
9.6%

Communication Services

7.4%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.6%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.9%

Basic Materials

2.6%
1.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Energy

0.4%
3.0%

Technology

CVLC
38.1%
UNOV
37.9%

Financial Services

CVLC
13.2%
UNOV
11.7%

Industrials

CVLC
10.2%
UNOV
8.4%

Healthcare

CVLC
10.0%
UNOV
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CVLC
8.0%
UNOV
9.6%

Communication Services

CVLC
7.4%
UNOV
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

CVLC
4.7%
UNOV
4.6%

Real Estate

CVLC
2.8%
UNOV
1.9%

Basic Materials

CVLC
2.6%
UNOV
1.7%

Utilities

CVLC
2.3%
UNOV
2.3%

Energy

CVLC
0.4%
UNOV
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVLC vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVLC
CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

UNOV
UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVLC vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVLCUNOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.68

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

12.59

-0.97

CVLC vs. UNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the UNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and UNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than UNOV's maximum drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and UNOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLCUNOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-13.84%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-4.52%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-9.10%

-10.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-1.63%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

0.96%

+1.22%

Volatility

CVLC vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) at 2.02%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVLCUNOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

2.02%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

5.13%

+5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

6.01%

+7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

6.94%

+8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

7.70%

+7.86%

CVLC vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVLC vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
0.91%1.02%1.03%0.91%
UNOV
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CVLC and UNOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVLC has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to UNOV (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs UNOV's -13.84%.

On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 20.86% vs 9.62% for UNOV. On fees, CVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 9.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.

CVLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.

CVLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UNOV is Defined Outcome. CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UNOV tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.79% for UNOV.

UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVLC and UNOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer