CVLC vs. SPXM

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CVLC (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CVLC is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. Over the past year, CVLC returned 22.82% vs 8.67% for SPXM. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.

Performance

CVLC vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CVLC

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 0.91%
• 6M: 9.50%
• YTD: 11.97%
• 1Y: 22.82%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPXM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 8.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVLC vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	11.97%	9.94%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.00%	9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and SPXM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.51

The correlation between CVLC and SPXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CVLC vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVLC

CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 67
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 65
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SPXM

SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 60
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVLC vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVLC	SPXM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.39	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	1.97	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.38	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	2.10	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.60	9.84	+0.75

CVLC vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and SPXM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVLC	SPXM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-5.08%	-14.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-5.08%	-4.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-0.75%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	-0.78%	-1.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	—	—

Volatility

CVLC vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVLC	SPXM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	0.00%	+4.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	3.99%	+6.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.15%	7.68%	+5.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.57%	7.64%	+7.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.57%	7.64%	+7.93%

CVLC vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVLC vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	0.92%	1.02%	1.03%	0.91%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVLC and SPXM in my portfolio?

CVLC and SPXM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVLC or SPXM?

CVLC has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

Which ETF is better, CVLC or SPXM?

On 1-year performance, CVLC leads with 22.82% vs 8.67% for SPXM. On fees, CVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVLC or SPXM?

Over the 1-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 22.82% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVLC or SPXM?

CVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVLC or SPXM?

CVLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

What is the main difference between CVLC and SPXM?

They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.47% for SPXM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.