CVLC vs. GXLC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CVLC (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CVLC tracks the Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GXLC tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. CVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

CVLC vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC's 11.54% return.

CVLC

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 1.48%
• 6M: 11.48%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 1Y: 25.31%
• 3Y*: 20.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.03%

GXLC

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 1.54%
• 6M: 9.67%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	$2.52M	$3.35M	$3.05M
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	$25.69K	$21.89K	$18.29K

CVLC vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	13.62%	3.47%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	11.54%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and GXLC is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.98

Return for Risk

CVLC vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVLC

CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 77
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 82

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVLC vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVLC	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.63	—	—

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVLC	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-9.08%	-10.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.16%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-1.57%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CVLC	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.79%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.45%	13.64%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.56%	13.64%	+1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.56%	13.64%	+1.92%

CVLC vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CVLC vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than GXLC's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	0.91%	1.02%	1.03%	0.91%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.63%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVLC and GXLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, CVLC and GXLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CVLC or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVLC or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVLC or GXLC?

CVLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.63% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between CVLC and GXLC?

CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.02% for GXLC.