CVLC vs. CVMC
CVLC (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and CVMC (Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CVMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVLC returned 22.60%/yr vs 16.44%/yr for CVMC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
CVLC vs. CVMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly lower than CVMC's 15.52% return.
CVLC
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 31.25%
- 3Y*
- 22.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVMC
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 15.52%
- 6M
- 16.50%
- 1Y
- 27.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVLC vs. CVMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 13.18% | 16.13% | 24.20% | 17.14% |
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 15.52% | 9.52% | 12.57% | 4.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVLC and CVMC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between CVLC and CVMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
CVLC vs. CVMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVLC
CVMC
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
CVLC
CVMC
Financial Services
CVLC
CVMC
Industrials
CVLC
CVMC
Healthcare
CVLC
CVMC
Consumer Cyclical
CVLC
CVMC
Communication Services
CVLC
CVMC
Consumer Defensive
CVLC
CVMC
Real Estate
CVLC
CVMC
Utilities
CVLC
CVMC
Basic Materials
CVLC
CVMC
Energy
CVLC
CVMC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVLC vs. CVMC — Risk / Return Rank
CVLC
CVMC
CVLC vs. CVMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVLC | CVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 1.95 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.46 | 2.87 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.34 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.87 | +0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.18 | 11.57 | +3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVLC | CVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.95 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.77 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
CVLC vs. CVMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum CVMC drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and CVMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVLC | CVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -22.53% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -9.35% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | -22.53% | +2.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -4.19% | +1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.32% | -0.23% |
Volatility
CVLC vs. CVMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) is 3.30%, while Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that CVLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVLC | CVMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 4.03% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 10.54% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 13.93% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 16.47% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 16.47% | -0.92% |
CVLC vs. CVMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CVLC and CVMC have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CVLC vs. CVMC - Dividend Comparison
CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than CVMC's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 0.89% | 1.02% | 1.03% | 0.91% |
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 1.17% | 1.39% | 1.21% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVLC and CVMC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVMC has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to CVLC (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs CVMC's -22.53%.
On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 22.60% vs 16.44% for CVMC. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, CVLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 22.60% return vs 16.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CVLC and CVMC have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
CVMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.89% for CVLC.
CVLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CVMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities. CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index.
CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVLC and CVMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer