PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVLC vs. CVMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVLC vs. CVMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than CVMC's 20.24% return.


CVLC

1D
1.46%
1M
1.48%
6M
11.48%
YTD
13.62%
1Y
25.31%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.03%

CVMC

1D
1.14%
1M
0.45%
6M
15.46%
YTD
20.24%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.52M$3.35M$3.05M
$233.55K$229.94K$243.24K

CVLC vs. CVMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
13.62%16.13%24.20%19.04%
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
20.24%9.52%12.57%6.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CVLC and CVMC is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.86

The correlation between CVLC and CVMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVLC vs. CVMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVLC
CVMC

Technology

38.1%
17.3%

Financial Services

13.2%
15.7%

Industrials

10.2%
20.1%

Healthcare

10.0%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
9.2%

Communication Services

7.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.2%

Real Estate

2.8%
7.8%

Basic Materials

2.6%
3.0%

Utilities

2.3%
5.8%

Energy

0.4%
0.3%

Technology

CVLC
38.1%
CVMC
17.3%

Financial Services

CVLC
13.2%
CVMC
15.7%

Industrials

CVLC
10.2%
CVMC
20.1%

Healthcare

CVLC
10.0%
CVMC
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CVLC
8.0%
CVMC
9.2%

Communication Services

CVLC
7.4%
CVMC
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

CVLC
4.7%
CVMC
5.2%

Real Estate

CVLC
2.8%
CVMC
7.8%

Basic Materials

CVLC
2.6%
CVMC
3.0%

Utilities

CVLC
2.3%
CVMC
5.8%

Energy

CVLC
0.4%
CVMC
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVLC vs. CVMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVLC
CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CVMC
CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVLC vs. CVMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVLCCVMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.95

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

11.93

-0.30

CVLC vs. CVMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the CVMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVLC and CVMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVLC vs. CVMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum CVMC drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and CVMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVLCCVMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-22.53%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-9.35%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-22.53%

+2.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-4.03%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.31%

-0.13%

Volatility

CVLC vs. CVMC - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) at 3.32%. This indicates that CVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVLCCVMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.32%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

10.98%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

14.34%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

16.37%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

16.37%

-0.81%

CVLC vs. CVMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CVLC and CVMC have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CVLC vs. CVMC - Dividend Comparison

CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than CVMC's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CVLC
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
0.91%1.02%1.03%0.91%
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.17%1.39%1.21%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVLC and CVMC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVLC has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to CVMC (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVLC dropped -19.92% vs CVMC's -22.53%.

On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 20.86% vs 15.97% for CVMC. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, CVMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 15.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVLC and CVMC have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

CVMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.91% for CVLC.

CVLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CVMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities. CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index.

CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVLC and CVMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer