CUZ vs. BIP
CUZ (Cousins Properties Incorporated) and BIP (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP) are both stocks. CUZ operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate), while BIP operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, CUZ returned 2.69%/yr vs 13.11%/yr for BIP. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CUZ vs. BIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CUZ achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than BIP's 9.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CUZ has underperformed BIP with an annualized return of 2.69%, while BIP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.11% annualized return.
CUZ
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 8.26%
- YTD
- 14.31%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- -0.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- -0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
BIP
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -4.82%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 18.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.11%
CUZ vs. BIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUZ Cousins Properties Incorporated | 14.31% | -12.14% | 32.57% | 2.02% | -34.67% | 23.30% | -14.76% | 34.58% | -12.73% | 12.47% |
BIP Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP | 9.85% | 15.15% | 6.40% | 6.64% | -20.73% | 27.77% | 15.45% | 51.38% | -19.15% | 39.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CUZ and BIP is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2008 | 0.32 |
The correlation between CUZ and BIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CUZ:
$4.77B
BIP:
$16.81B
CUZ:
$0.12
BIP:
$0.91
CUZ:
248.01
BIP:
40.35
CUZ:
6.47
BIP:
0.70
CUZ:
1.05
BIP:
3.64
CUZ:
$744.24M
BIP:
$24.01B
CUZ:
$398.94M
BIP:
$6.49B
CUZ:
$580.60M
BIP:
$11.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CUZ vs. BIP — Risk / Return Rank
CUZ
BIP
CUZ vs. BIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CUZ | BIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.17 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 1.45 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 3.14 | -3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CUZ vs. BIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUZ drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, which is greater than BIP's maximum drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUZ and BIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CUZ | BIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.87% | -56.07% | -26.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.62% | -12.50% | -14.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.36% | -41.05% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.28% | -49.85% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | -51.33% | -2.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.24% | -5.08% | -46.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.46% | -10.24% | -25.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.71% | 5.77% | +6.94% |
Volatility
CUZ vs. BIP - Volatility Comparison
Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP) at 5.93%. This indicates that CUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CUZ | BIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.22% | 5.93% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.96% | 15.47% | +6.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.95% | 19.94% | +6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.96% | 26.74% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.10% | 28.03% | +2.07% |
Dividends
CUZ vs. BIP - Dividend Comparison
CUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than BIP's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP | 6.94% | 4.95% | 5.10% | 4.86% | 4.65% | 3.35% | 3.92% | 4.02% | 5.44% | 3.88% | 4.62% | 5.59% |
CUZ Cousins Properties Incorporated | 4.46% | 4.97% | 4.18% | 5.26% | 5.02% | 2.31% | 4.45% | 2.74% | 2.47% | 3.24% | 27.10% | 3.39% |
Financials
CUZ vs. BIP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cousins Properties Incorporated and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CUZ vs. BIP - Profitability Comparison
CUZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 756.00K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.
CUZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 756.00K, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
CUZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported a net income of -186.00K and revenue of 756.00K, resulting in a net margin of -24.6%.
BIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CUZ and BIP have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CUZ has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to BIP (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CUZ dropped -82.87% vs BIP's -56.07%.
BIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CUZ and BIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer