CUZ vs. PINE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).

Performance

CUZ vs. PINE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CUZ vs. PINE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CUZ Cousins Properties Incorporated	-11.36%	-12.14%	32.57%	2.02%	-34.67%	23.30%	-14.76%	3.39%
PINE Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.	9.37%	6.97%	6.13%	-5.46%	0.95%	41.19%	-15.69%	0.47%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CUZ : $3.78B PINE : $279.95M
EPS CUZ : $0.26 PINE : -$0.21
PS Ratio CUZ : 5.14 PINE : 4.60
PB Ratio CUZ : 0.80 PINE : 0.93
Total Revenue (TTM) CUZ : $739.94M PINE : $60.53M
Gross Profit (TTM) CUZ : $507.42M PINE : $51.49M
EBITDA (TTM) CUZ : $576.67M PINE : $43.33M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUZ achieves a -11.36% return, which is significantly lower than PINE's 9.37% return.

CUZ

• 1D: 3.58%
• 1M: -2.55%
• YTD: -11.36%
• 6M: -20.15%
• 1Y: -19.95%
• 3Y*: 7.15%
• 5Y*: -4.64%
• 10Y*: 0.02%

PINE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -7.27%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 31.18%
• 1Y: 15.40%
• 3Y*: 9.43%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CUZ vs. PINE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUZ

CUZ Risk / Return Rank: 12
CUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

PINE

PINE Risk / Return Rank: 60
PINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PINE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PINE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUZ vs. PINE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CUZ	PINE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	0.69	-1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.89	1.11	-2.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.13	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	0.80	-1.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.64	1.62	-3.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CUZ vs. PINE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the PINE Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUZ and PINE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CUZ	PINE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.73	0.69	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16	0.28	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.14	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CUZ and PINE is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CUZ vs. PINE - Dividend Comparison

CUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than PINE's 6.42% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CUZ Cousins Properties Incorporated	5.67%	4.97%	4.18%	5.26%	5.02%	2.31%	4.45%	2.74%	2.47%	3.24%	27.10%	3.39%
PINE Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.	6.42%	6.82%	6.61%	6.51%	5.71%	5.06%	5.47%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CUZ vs. PINE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUZ drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, which is greater than PINE's maximum drawdown of -60.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUZ and PINE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CUZ	PINE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.87%	-60.00%	-22.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.66%	-20.13%	-7.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.28%	-26.68%	-27.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.19%	-10.93%	-51.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.34%	-12.44%	-22.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.21%	9.99%	+2.22%

Volatility

CUZ vs. PINE - Volatility Comparison

Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) at 6.09%. This indicates that CUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PINE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CUZ	PINE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.86%	6.09%	+3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.81%	16.26%	+4.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.50%	22.52%	+4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.80%	24.11%	+4.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.03%	39.58%	-9.55%

Financials

CUZ vs. PINE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cousins Properties Incorporated and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CUZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PINE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.97M and revenue of 16.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.6%.

CUZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PINE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.96M and revenue of 16.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.3%.

CUZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cousins Properties Incorporated reported a net income of -190.00K and revenue of 1.16M, resulting in a net margin of -16.4%.

PINE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 921.00K and revenue of 16.90M, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.