CUZ vs. PINE
Compare and contrast key facts about Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CUZ or PINE.
Key characteristics
| CUZ | PINE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 33.05% | 10.18% |
| 1Y Return | 59.12% | 17.55% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.08% | 3.94% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.23 | 0.77 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.07 | 1.24 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.89 | 0.73 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.11 | 2.35 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.29% | 7.30% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.18% | 22.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -83.14% | -60.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -47.17% | -5.86% |
Fundamentals
| CUZ | PINE | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.73B | $277.39M |
| EPS | $0.34 | $0.23 |
| PE Ratio | 91.41 | 77.83 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $828.41M | $49.49M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $375.48M | $32.58M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $518.45M | $38.49M |
Correlation
The correlation between CUZ and PINE is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CUZ vs. PINE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CUZ achieves a 33.05% return, which is significantly higher than PINE's 10.18% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CUZ vs. PINE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CUZ vs. PINE - Dividend Comparison
CUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than PINE's 6.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUZ Cousins Properties Incorporated | 4.16% | 5.26% | 5.02% | 2.31% | 4.45% | 2.75% | 2.47% | 3.24% | 1.99% | 3.39% | 2.63% | 1.75% |
PINE Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. | 6.24% | 6.51% | 5.71% | 5.06% | 5.47% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CUZ vs. PINE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CUZ drawdown since its inception was -83.14%, which is greater than PINE's maximum drawdown of -60.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUZ and PINE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CUZ vs. PINE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is 5.94%, while Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that CUZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PINE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CUZ vs. PINE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cousins Properties Incorporated and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities