PortfoliosLab logo
CUZ vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CUZ and VOO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

CUZ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
128.44%
557.08%
CUZ
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CUZ:

1.06

VOO:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

CUZ:

1.56

VOO:

0.88

Omega Ratio

CUZ:

1.20

VOO:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

CUZ:

0.44

VOO:

0.55

Martin Ratio

CUZ:

5.17

VOO:

2.27

Ulcer Index

CUZ:

5.39%

VOO:

4.55%

Daily Std Dev

CUZ:

26.40%

VOO:

19.19%

Max Drawdown

CUZ:

-83.34%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

CUZ:

-51.93%

VOO:

-9.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUZ achieves a -7.58% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -5.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CUZ has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 3.51%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.


CUZ

YTD

-7.58%

1M

-6.37%

6M

-10.22%

1Y

26.02%

5Y*

4.51%

10Y*

3.51%

VOO

YTD

-5.74%

1M

-3.16%

6M

-4.28%

1Y

10.88%

5Y*

16.04%

10Y*

12.07%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CUZ vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CUZ is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CUZ is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CUZ is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CUZ is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CUZ is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CUZ is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CUZ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CUZ, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CUZ: 1.06
VOO: 0.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for CUZ, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CUZ: 1.56
VOO: 0.88
The chart of Omega ratio for CUZ, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CUZ: 1.20
VOO: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for CUZ, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CUZ: 0.69
VOO: 0.55
The chart of Martin ratio for CUZ, currently valued at 5.17, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CUZ: 5.17
VOO: 2.27

The current CUZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUZ and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.06
0.54
CUZ
VOO

Dividends

CUZ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

CUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than VOO's 1.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CUZ
Cousins Properties Incorporated
4.62%4.18%5.26%5.02%2.31%4.45%2.75%2.47%3.24%1.99%3.39%2.63%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.38%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

CUZ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUZ drawdown since its inception was -83.34%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUZ and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-22.55%
-9.90%
CUZ
VOO

Volatility

CUZ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) is 12.79%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 13.96%. This indicates that CUZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.79%
13.96%
CUZ
VOO