PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIP vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIP vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIP achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 13.56%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.19% annualized return.


BIP

1D
-0.18%
1M
8.52%
YTD
14.31%
6M
10.25%
1Y
22.94%
3Y*
7.18%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
13.56%

XLU

1D
1.86%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
3.55%
6M
1.36%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIP vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIP
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
14.31%15.15%6.40%6.64%-20.73%27.77%15.45%51.38%-19.15%39.72%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.55%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BIP and XLU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2008

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between BIP and XLU has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIP vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIP
BIP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIP vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIPXLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

0.68

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

1.01

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.11

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.01

2.52

+1.49

BIP vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIP and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIPXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

0.68

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.54

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.48

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.40

+0.10

Drawdowns

BIP vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIP drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIPXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.07%

-51.98%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-9.18%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.53%

-17.26%

-24.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.85%

-25.26%

-24.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

-36.07%

-15.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-7.38%

+6.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-10.22%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

4.07%

+1.68%

Volatility

BIP vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.41%. This indicates that BIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIPXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

5.41%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.25%

11.76%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

14.56%

+5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.67%

17.32%

+9.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.03%

19.26%

+8.77%

Dividends

BIP vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

BIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than XLU's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIP
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
4.56%4.95%5.10%4.86%4.65%3.35%3.92%4.02%5.44%3.88%4.62%5.59%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.71%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIP and XLU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIP has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to XLU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIP dropped -56.07% vs XLU's -51.98%.

BIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIP and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer